Financhill
Sell
50

BNHUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$27.10
Seasonality move :
17.95%
Day range:
$27.10 - $27.10
52-week range:
$27.10 - $27.10
Dividend yield:
2.44%
P/E ratio:
9.97x
P/S ratio:
0.97x
P/B ratio:
1.37x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$1.3B
EPS (TTM):
$2.72

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
-- -- -- -- --
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
-- -- -- -- --
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
-- -- -- -- --
NLLSF
NEL ASA
-- -- -- -- --
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
-- -- -- -- --
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
$27.10 -- $1.2B 9.97x $0.66 2.44% 0.97x
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
$0.15 -- $10.5M 0.09x $0.35 383.4% 0.12x
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
$1.7400 -- $772M 3.11x $0.08 21.25% 1.48x
NLLSF
NEL ASA
$0.27 -- $499.4M -- $0.00 0% 3.92x
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
$1.78 -- $1.9B 12.11x $0.00 0% 0.54x
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
$15.66 -- $4.6B 41.66x $0.21 1.33% 3.21x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
53.7% 0.087 75.16% 1.54x
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
-- -3.813 -- --
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
34.21% 0.608 63.35% 2.55x
NLLSF
NEL ASA
-- -0.449 -- 2.42x
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
53.42% -0.177 47.23% 1.06x
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
36.59% 0.501 8.71% 1.92x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
BNHUF
Bonheur ASA
-- $76M 6.56% 13.43% 40.09% $4.6M
ASCJF
AMSC ASA
-- -$543.1K -- -- -- $2.1M
MPZZF
MPC Container Ships ASA
$76.8M $60.6M 23.67% 31.19% 51.69% $38.9M
NLLSF
NEL ASA
$9.1M -$18.6M -7.56% -7.57% -102.99% -$10.6M
NWARF
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
$193.4M $102.3M 17.48% 31.38% 13.09% $288.9M
TMRAY
Tomra Systems ASA
$136.8M $21M 10.6% 16.7% 6.54% $68.4M

Bonheur ASA vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns BNHUF or ASCJF?

    AMSC ASA has a net margin of 27% compared to Bonheur ASA's net margin of --. Bonheur ASA's return on equity of 13.43% beat AMSC ASA's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    -- $2.00 $2B
    ASCJF
    AMSC ASA
    -- $0.41 --
  • What do Analysts Say About BNHUF or ASCJF?

    Bonheur ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AMSC ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bonheur ASA has higher upside potential than AMSC ASA, analysts believe Bonheur ASA is more attractive than AMSC ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0 0 0
    ASCJF
    AMSC ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is BNHUF or ASCJF More Risky?

    Bonheur ASA has a beta of -0.424, which suggesting that the stock is 142.401% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMSC ASA has a beta of 0.159, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.06%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BNHUF or ASCJF?

    Bonheur ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. AMSC ASA offers a yield of 383.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Bonheur ASA pays 40.32% of its earnings as a dividend. AMSC ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bonheur ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BNHUF or ASCJF?

    Bonheur ASA quarterly revenues are $314.7M, which are larger than AMSC ASA quarterly revenues of --. Bonheur ASA's net income of $85M is higher than AMSC ASA's net income of $29.8M. Notably, Bonheur ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.97x while AMSC ASA's PE ratio is 0.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bonheur ASA is 0.97x versus 0.12x for AMSC ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0.97x 9.97x $314.7M $85M
    ASCJF
    AMSC ASA
    0.12x 0.09x -- $29.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns BNHUF or MPZZF?

    MPC Container Ships ASA has a net margin of 27% compared to Bonheur ASA's net margin of 46.95%. Bonheur ASA's return on equity of 13.43% beat MPC Container Ships ASA's return on equity of 31.19%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    -- $2.00 $2B
    MPZZF
    MPC Container Ships ASA
    60.45% $0.13 $1.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About BNHUF or MPZZF?

    Bonheur ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MPC Container Ships ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bonheur ASA has higher upside potential than MPC Container Ships ASA, analysts believe Bonheur ASA is more attractive than MPC Container Ships ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0 0 0
    MPZZF
    MPC Container Ships ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is BNHUF or MPZZF More Risky?

    Bonheur ASA has a beta of -0.424, which suggesting that the stock is 142.401% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MPC Container Ships ASA has a beta of 0.007, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.29%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BNHUF or MPZZF?

    Bonheur ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. MPC Container Ships ASA offers a yield of 21.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Bonheur ASA pays 40.32% of its earnings as a dividend. MPC Container Ships ASA pays out 76.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BNHUF or MPZZF?

    Bonheur ASA quarterly revenues are $314.7M, which are larger than MPC Container Ships ASA quarterly revenues of $127.1M. Bonheur ASA's net income of $85M is higher than MPC Container Ships ASA's net income of $59.7M. Notably, Bonheur ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.97x while MPC Container Ships ASA's PE ratio is 3.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bonheur ASA is 0.97x versus 1.48x for MPC Container Ships ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0.97x 9.97x $314.7M $85M
    MPZZF
    MPC Container Ships ASA
    1.48x 3.11x $127.1M $59.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns BNHUF or NLLSF?

    NEL ASA has a net margin of 27% compared to Bonheur ASA's net margin of -115.47%. Bonheur ASA's return on equity of 13.43% beat NEL ASA's return on equity of -7.57%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    -- $2.00 $2B
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    64.63% -$0.01 $482.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About BNHUF or NLLSF?

    Bonheur ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NEL ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bonheur ASA has higher upside potential than NEL ASA, analysts believe Bonheur ASA is more attractive than NEL ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0 0 0
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is BNHUF or NLLSF More Risky?

    Bonheur ASA has a beta of -0.424, which suggesting that the stock is 142.401% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NEL ASA has a beta of 1.965, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.46%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BNHUF or NLLSF?

    Bonheur ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. NEL ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bonheur ASA pays 40.32% of its earnings as a dividend. NEL ASA pays out -255.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Bonheur ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BNHUF or NLLSF?

    Bonheur ASA quarterly revenues are $314.7M, which are larger than NEL ASA quarterly revenues of $14M. Bonheur ASA's net income of $85M is higher than NEL ASA's net income of -$16.2M. Notably, Bonheur ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.97x while NEL ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bonheur ASA is 0.97x versus 3.92x for NEL ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0.97x 9.97x $314.7M $85M
    NLLSF
    NEL ASA
    3.92x -- $14M -$16.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns BNHUF or NWARF?

    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a net margin of 27% compared to Bonheur ASA's net margin of 9.05%. Bonheur ASA's return on equity of 13.43% beat Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's return on equity of 31.38%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    -- $2.00 $2B
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    19.4% $0.08 $1.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About BNHUF or NWARF?

    Bonheur ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bonheur ASA has higher upside potential than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA, analysts believe Bonheur ASA is more attractive than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0 0 0
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is BNHUF or NWARF More Risky?

    Bonheur ASA has a beta of -0.424, which suggesting that the stock is 142.401% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.377%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BNHUF or NWARF?

    Bonheur ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bonheur ASA pays 40.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bonheur ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BNHUF or NWARF?

    Bonheur ASA quarterly revenues are $314.7M, which are smaller than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA quarterly revenues of $997M. Bonheur ASA's net income of $85M is lower than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net income of $90.3M. Notably, Bonheur ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.97x while Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's PE ratio is 12.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bonheur ASA is 0.97x versus 0.54x for Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0.97x 9.97x $314.7M $85M
    NWARF
    Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
    0.54x 12.11x $997M $90.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns BNHUF or TMRAY?

    Tomra Systems ASA has a net margin of 27% compared to Bonheur ASA's net margin of 3.27%. Bonheur ASA's return on equity of 13.43% beat Tomra Systems ASA's return on equity of 16.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    -- $2.00 $2B
    TMRAY
    Tomra Systems ASA
    42.48% $0.03 $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About BNHUF or TMRAY?

    Bonheur ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tomra Systems ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bonheur ASA has higher upside potential than Tomra Systems ASA, analysts believe Bonheur ASA is more attractive than Tomra Systems ASA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0 0 0
    TMRAY
    Tomra Systems ASA
    0 0 0
  • Is BNHUF or TMRAY More Risky?

    Bonheur ASA has a beta of -0.424, which suggesting that the stock is 142.401% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tomra Systems ASA has a beta of 2.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.255%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BNHUF or TMRAY?

    Bonheur ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Tomra Systems ASA offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Bonheur ASA pays 40.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Tomra Systems ASA pays out 53.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BNHUF or TMRAY?

    Bonheur ASA quarterly revenues are $314.7M, which are smaller than Tomra Systems ASA quarterly revenues of $322M. Bonheur ASA's net income of $85M is higher than Tomra Systems ASA's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Bonheur ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.97x while Tomra Systems ASA's PE ratio is 41.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bonheur ASA is 0.97x versus 3.21x for Tomra Systems ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BNHUF
    Bonheur ASA
    0.97x 9.97x $314.7M $85M
    TMRAY
    Tomra Systems ASA
    3.21x 41.66x $322M $10.5M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?

GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…

Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?

Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…

Can Levi Stock Double?
Can Levi Stock Double?

Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Alerts

Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.

Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.14% over the past day.

Buy
60
U alert for Jul 17

Unity Software [U] is up 7.51% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock