Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Buy
74
BABAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$14.50
Seasonality move
:
2.64%
Day range:
$14.50 - $14.66
52-week range:
$8.99 - $18.91
Dividend yield:
0.91%
P/E ratio:
15.56x
P/S ratio:
2.03x
P/B ratio:
1.99x
Volume:
1.8K
Avg. volume:
105.6K
1-year change:
48.11%
Market cap:
$276.8B
Revenue:
$138.3B
EPS (TTM):
$0.93
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABAF
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$35.6B | -- | 5.92% | -- | -- |
|
BZUN
Baozun
|
$270.8M | $0.03 | -0.49% | -72.85% | $4.25 |
|
MGIH
Millennium Group International Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MI
NFT
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$1.2B | $0.04 | 3.28% | -16.67% | $8.99 |
|
OCG
Oriental Culture Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABAF
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$14.50 | -- | $276.8B | 15.56x | $0.25 | 0.91% | 2.03x |
|
BZUN
Baozun
|
$2.94 | $4.25 | $169.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.13x |
|
MGIH
Millennium Group International Holdings
|
$1.58 | -- | $17.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.62x |
|
MI
NFT
|
$2.60 | -- | $13.2M | 0.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 14.41x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$8.81 | $8.99 | $3.6B | 62.48x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.79x |
|
OCG
Oriental Culture Holding
|
$5.20 | -- | $107.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 110.45x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABAF
Alibaba Group Holding
|
18.6% | -0.182 | 9.74% | 1.28x |
|
BZUN
Baozun
|
29.6% | 0.716 | 53.7% | 1.25x |
|
MGIH
Millennium Group International Holdings
|
15.24% | 1.345 | 33.99% | 1.91x |
|
MI
NFT
|
-- | -0.406 | -- | 6.85x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
122.72% | 2.171 | 281.26% | 1.08x |
|
OCG
Oriental Culture Holding
|
-- | -6.604 | -- | 9.66x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BABAF
Alibaba Group Holding
|
$12.5B | $3.9B | 10.09% | 12.03% | 8.87% | -$8.1B |
|
BZUN
Baozun
|
$136.5M | -$11.5M | -2.46% | -3.14% | -3.18% | -$24.2M |
|
MGIH
Millennium Group International Holdings
|
-- | -- | -18.52% | -23.75% | -- | -- |
|
MI
NFT
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$459.1M | $158.9M | 0.97% | -- | 12.32% | -- |
|
OCG
Oriental Culture Holding
|
-- | -- | -6.99% | -6.99% | -- | -- |
Alibaba Group Holding vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BABAF or BZUN?
Baozun has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of -3.06%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 12.03% beat Baozun's return on equity of -3.14%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAFAlibaba Group Holding38.41% $0.09 $181.8B BZUNBaozun48.09% -$0.15 $1B -
What do Analysts Say About BABAF or BZUN?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Baozun has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 44.71%. Given that Baozun has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding, analysts believe Baozun is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAFAlibaba Group Holding0 0 0 BZUNBaozun6 2 0 -
Is BABAF or BZUN More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baozun has a beta of 0.313, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.692%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABAF or BZUN?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Baozun offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Baozun pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABAF or BZUN?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $32.5B, which are larger than Baozun quarterly revenues of $283.8M. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $1.7B is higher than Baozun's net income of -$8.7M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Baozun's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 2.03x versus 0.13x for Baozun. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAFAlibaba Group Holding2.03x 15.56x $32.5B $1.7B BZUNBaozun0.13x -- $283.8M -$8.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns BABAF or MGIH?
Millennium Group International Holdings has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of --. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 12.03% beat Millennium Group International Holdings's return on equity of -23.75%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAFAlibaba Group Holding38.41% $0.09 $181.8B MGIHMillennium Group International Holdings-- -- $36.6M -
What do Analysts Say About BABAF or MGIH?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Millennium Group International Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than Millennium Group International Holdings, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than Millennium Group International Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAFAlibaba Group Holding0 0 0 MGIHMillennium Group International Holdings0 0 0 -
Is BABAF or MGIH More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Millennium Group International Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABAF or MGIH?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Millennium Group International Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Millennium Group International Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABAF or MGIH?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $32.5B, which are larger than Millennium Group International Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $1.7B is higher than Millennium Group International Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Millennium Group International Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 2.03x versus 0.62x for Millennium Group International Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAFAlibaba Group Holding2.03x 15.56x $32.5B $1.7B MGIHMillennium Group International Holdings0.62x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BABAF or MI?
NFT has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of --. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 12.03% beat NFT's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAFAlibaba Group Holding38.41% $0.09 $181.8B MINFT-- -- $74.8M -
What do Analysts Say About BABAF or MI?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NFT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than NFT, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than NFT.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAFAlibaba Group Holding0 0 0 MINFT0 0 0 -
Is BABAF or MI More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NFT has a beta of 3.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 259.58%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABAF or MI?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. NFT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.35% of its earnings as a dividend. NFT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABAF or MI?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $32.5B, which are larger than NFT quarterly revenues of --. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $1.7B is higher than NFT's net income of --. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while NFT's PE ratio is 0.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 2.03x versus 14.41x for NFT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAFAlibaba Group Holding2.03x 15.56x $32.5B $1.7B MINFT14.41x 0.77x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BABAF or MLCO?
Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of 2.64%. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 12.03% beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAFAlibaba Group Holding38.41% $0.09 $181.8B MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment37.26% $0.08 $6.2B -
What do Analysts Say About BABAF or MLCO?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $8.99 which suggests that it could grow by 1.99%. Given that Melco Resorts and Entertainment has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding, analysts believe Melco Resorts and Entertainment is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAFAlibaba Group Holding0 0 0 MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment6 6 0 -
Is BABAF or MLCO More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 0.825, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.541%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABAF or MLCO?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out 0.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABAF or MLCO?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $32.5B, which are larger than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $1.7B is higher than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of $32.5M. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is 62.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 2.03x versus 0.79x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAFAlibaba Group Holding2.03x 15.56x $32.5B $1.7B MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment0.79x 62.48x $1.2B $32.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns BABAF or OCG?
Oriental Culture Holding has a net margin of 5.31% compared to Alibaba Group Holding's net margin of --. Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 12.03% beat Oriental Culture Holding's return on equity of -6.99%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BABAFAlibaba Group Holding38.41% $0.09 $181.8B OCGOriental Culture Holding-- -- $51.1M -
What do Analysts Say About BABAF or OCG?
Alibaba Group Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oriental Culture Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Alibaba Group Holding has higher upside potential than Oriental Culture Holding, analysts believe Alibaba Group Holding is more attractive than Oriental Culture Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BABAFAlibaba Group Holding0 0 0 OCGOriental Culture Holding0 0 0 -
Is BABAF or OCG More Risky?
Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.805% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oriental Culture Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BABAF or OCG?
Alibaba Group Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.91%. Oriental Culture Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alibaba Group Holding pays 22.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Oriental Culture Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BABAF or OCG?
Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues are $32.5B, which are larger than Oriental Culture Holding quarterly revenues of --. Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $1.7B is higher than Oriental Culture Holding's net income of --. Notably, Alibaba Group Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Oriental Culture Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alibaba Group Holding is 2.03x versus 110.45x for Oriental Culture Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BABAFAlibaba Group Holding2.03x 15.56x $32.5B $1.7B OCGOriental Culture Holding110.45x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?
If you know popular consumer appliance brands Shark and Ninja,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 7.22% over the past day.
Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 0.5% over the past day.
Sell
42
VLCN alert for Jul 17
Volcon [VLCN] is up 202.14% over the past day.
