Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Buy
92
OND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$44.05
Seasonality move
:
-1.52%
Day range:
$43.51 - $43.78
52-week range:
$25.56 - $44.40
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
6.3K
Avg. volume:
3.3K
1-year change:
50.95%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
$43.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0% | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
$37.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.27 | 0.71% | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
$108.70 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 0.34% | -- |
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
$86.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.38 | 0.48% | -- |
|
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
|
$32.25 | -- | -- | -- | $0.15 | 1.11% | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
$53.99 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 0.2% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | 1.422 | -- | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
-- | 1.405 | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | 1.321 | -- | -- |
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
-- | 1.457 | -- | -- |
|
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
|
-- | 1.019 | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | 1.466 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BNGE
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SOCL
Global X Social Media ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares On-Demand ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or BNGE?
First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- BNGEFirst Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or BNGE?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 BNGEFirst Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or BNGE More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or BNGE?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or BNGE?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- BNGEFirst Trust S-Network Streaming & Gaming ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or ESPO?
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or ESPO?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or ESPO More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF has a beta of 1.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.628%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or ESPO?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or ESPO?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- ESPOVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or GAMR?
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or GAMR?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or GAMR More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.259%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or GAMR?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or GAMR?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- GAMRAmplify Video Game Leaders ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or HERO?
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Video Games & Esports ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- HEROGlobal X Video Games & Esports ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or HERO?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Video Games & Esports ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Video Games & Esports ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than Global X Video Games & Esports ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 HEROGlobal X Video Games & Esports ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or HERO More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Video Games & Esports ETF has a beta of 1.006, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.61800000000001%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or HERO?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global X Video Games & Esports ETF offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Video Games & Esports ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or HERO?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Video Games & Esports ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Video Games & Esports ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Video Games & Esports ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Video Games & Esports ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- HEROGlobal X Video Games & Esports ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OND or SOCL?
Global X Social Media ETF has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares On-Demand ETF's net margin of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Social Media ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OND or SOCL?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Social Media ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares On-Demand ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Social Media ETF, analysts believe ProShares On-Demand ETF is more attractive than Global X Social Media ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONDProShares On-Demand ETF0 0 0 SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF0 0 0 -
Is OND or SOCL More Risky?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Social Media ETF has a beta of 1.043, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.264%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OND or SOCL?
ProShares On-Demand ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global X Social Media ETF offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. ProShares On-Demand ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Social Media ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OND or SOCL?
ProShares On-Demand ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Social Media ETF quarterly revenues of --. ProShares On-Demand ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Social Media ETF's net income of --. Notably, ProShares On-Demand ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Social Media ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares On-Demand ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Social Media ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONDProShares On-Demand ETF-- -- -- -- SOCLGlobal X Social Media ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
80
SOC alert for Jul 18
Sable Offshore [SOC] is up 11.86% over the past day.
Buy
71
PGY alert for Jul 18
Pagaya Technologies [PGY] is up 5.56% over the past day.
Buy
68
MCRI alert for Jul 18
Monarch Casino & Resort [MCRI] is up 0.31% over the past day.
