Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Buy
70
KWEB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$35.51
Seasonality move
:
0.12%
Day range:
$34.95 - $35.44
52-week range:
$24.68 - $39.17
Dividend yield:
2.9%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
21M
Avg. volume:
15.8M
1-year change:
27.36%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
$35.33 | -- | -- | -- | $1.03 | 2.9% | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
$28.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 1.07% | -- |
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
$45.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 0.24% | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
$37.47 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 2.56% | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
$27.35 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 1.22% | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
$56.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.54 | 2.53% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | 0.281 | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | 0.718 | -- | -- |
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | 0.268 | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | 0.639 | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | 0.780 | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | 0.748 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or ASHR?
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or ASHR?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or ASHR More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.77%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or ASHR?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or ASHR?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or CQQQ?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or CQQQ?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco China Technology ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco China Technology ETF, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than Invesco China Technology ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or CQQQ More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.531, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.859%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or CQQQ?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Invesco China Technology ETF offers a yield of 0.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco China Technology ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or CQQQ?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco China Technology ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco China Technology ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or FXI?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or FXI?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares China Large-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than iShares China Large-Cap ETF, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than iShares China Large-Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or FXI More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.887%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or FXI?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. iShares China Large-Cap ETF offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or FXI?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares China Large-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for iShares China Large-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or KGRN?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or KGRN?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or KGRN More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.009%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or KGRN?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or KGRN?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or MCHI?
iShares MSCI China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or MCHI?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI China ETF, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or MCHI More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.175% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI China ETF has a beta of 0.903, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.713%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or MCHI?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. iShares MSCI China ETF offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or MCHI?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI China ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI China ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?
If you know popular consumer appliance brands Shark and Ninja,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 3.56% over the past day.
Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is up 0.84% over the past day.
Sell
42
VLCN alert for Jul 17
Volcon [VLCN] is up 182.08% over the past day.
