Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Buy
80
IAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$51.84
Seasonality move
:
1.73%
Day range:
$50.79 - $51.92
52-week range:
$38.30 - $57.69
Dividend yield:
2.87%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
175.9K
Avg. volume:
264.9K
1-year change:
19.84%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAT
iShares US Regional Banks ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXO
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IAK
iShares US Insurance ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KIE
SPDR S&P Insurance ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RSPF
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAT
iShares US Regional Banks ETF
|
$51.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.38 | 2.87% | -- |
|
FXO
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund
|
$57.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 1.93% | -- |
|
IAK
iShares US Insurance ETF
|
$128.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.35 | 1.85% | -- |
|
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
|
$118.81 | -- | -- | -- | $0.38 | 1.81% | -- |
|
KIE
SPDR S&P Insurance ETF
|
$57.64 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 1.61% | -- |
|
RSPF
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF
|
$77.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 1.6% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAT
iShares US Regional Banks ETF
|
-- | 1.794 | -- | -- |
|
FXO
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 1.311 | -- | -- |
|
IAK
iShares US Insurance ETF
|
-- | 0.676 | -- | -- |
|
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
|
-- | 0.523 | -- | -- |
|
KIE
SPDR S&P Insurance ETF
|
-- | 0.833 | -- | -- |
|
RSPF
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF
|
-- | 1.234 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IAT
iShares US Regional Banks ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXO
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IAK
iShares US Insurance ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBWP
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KIE
SPDR S&P Insurance ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RSPF
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares US Regional Banks ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IAT or FXO?
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to iShares US Regional Banks ETF's net margin of --. iShares US Regional Banks ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF-- -- -- FXOFirst Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IAT or FXO?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares US Regional Banks ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe iShares US Regional Banks ETF is more attractive than First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF0 0 0 FXOFirst Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is IAT or FXO More Risky?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.95799999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.98%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAT or FXO?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. iShares US Regional Banks ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAT or FXO?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. iShares US Regional Banks ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, iShares US Regional Banks ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares US Regional Banks ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF-- -- -- -- FXOFirst Trust Financials AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IAT or IAK?
iShares US Insurance ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares US Regional Banks ETF's net margin of --. iShares US Regional Banks ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares US Insurance ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF-- -- -- IAKiShares US Insurance ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IAT or IAK?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares US Insurance ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares US Regional Banks ETF has higher upside potential than iShares US Insurance ETF, analysts believe iShares US Regional Banks ETF is more attractive than iShares US Insurance ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF0 0 0 IAKiShares US Insurance ETF0 0 0 -
Is IAT or IAK More Risky?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.95799999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares US Insurance ETF has a beta of 0.701, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.915%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAT or IAK?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. iShares US Insurance ETF offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. iShares US Regional Banks ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares US Insurance ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAT or IAK?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares US Insurance ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares US Regional Banks ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares US Insurance ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares US Regional Banks ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares US Insurance ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares US Regional Banks ETF is -- versus -- for iShares US Insurance ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF-- -- -- -- IAKiShares US Insurance ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IAT or KBWP?
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares US Regional Banks ETF's net margin of --. iShares US Regional Banks ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF-- -- -- KBWPInvesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IAT or KBWP?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares US Regional Banks ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF, analysts believe iShares US Regional Banks ETF is more attractive than Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF0 0 0 KBWPInvesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF0 0 0 -
Is IAT or KBWP More Risky?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.95799999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.355%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAT or KBWP?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. iShares US Regional Banks ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAT or KBWP?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares US Regional Banks ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares US Regional Banks ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares US Regional Banks ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF-- -- -- -- KBWPInvesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IAT or KIE?
SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares US Regional Banks ETF's net margin of --. iShares US Regional Banks ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF-- -- -- KIESPDR S&P Insurance ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IAT or KIE?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares US Regional Banks ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P Insurance ETF, analysts believe iShares US Regional Banks ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P Insurance ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF0 0 0 KIESPDR S&P Insurance ETF0 0 0 -
Is IAT or KIE More Risky?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.95799999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P Insurance ETF has a beta of 0.785, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.472%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAT or KIE?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. iShares US Regional Banks ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P Insurance ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAT or KIE?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P Insurance ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares US Regional Banks ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares US Regional Banks ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P Insurance ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares US Regional Banks ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P Insurance ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF-- -- -- -- KIESPDR S&P Insurance ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IAT or RSPF?
Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares US Regional Banks ETF's net margin of --. iShares US Regional Banks ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF-- -- -- RSPFInvesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About IAT or RSPF?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares US Regional Banks ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF, analysts believe iShares US Regional Banks ETF is more attractive than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF0 0 0 RSPFInvesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF0 0 0 -
Is IAT or RSPF More Risky?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.95799999999999% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.471%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IAT or RSPF?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. iShares US Regional Banks ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IAT or RSPF?
iShares US Regional Banks ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares US Regional Banks ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares US Regional Banks ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares US Regional Banks ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IATiShares US Regional Banks ETF-- -- -- -- RSPFInvesco S&P 500 Eql Wght Financials ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
72
SBET alert for Jul 18
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.
Buy
68
MCRI alert for Jul 18
Monarch Casino & Resort [MCRI] is up 19.81% over the past day.
Sell
41
NEGG alert for Jul 18
Newegg Commerce [NEGG] is up 17.85% over the past day.
