Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Sell
38
HAP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$52.68
Seasonality move
:
2.36%
Day range:
$52.46 - $52.69
52-week range:
$42.65 - $53.64
Dividend yield:
2.29%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
4.8K
Avg. volume:
5.2K
1-year change:
2.4%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
$52.68 | -- | -- | -- | $1.21 | 2.29% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$30.66 | -- | -- | -- | $0.97 | 3.15% | -- |
|
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
|
$72.99 | -- | -- | -- | $2.20 | 3.02% | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
$70.15 | -- | -- | -- | $2.08 | 2.96% | -- |
|
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
|
$22.28 | -- | -- | -- | $0.81 | 3.64% | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
$49.14 | -- | -- | -- | $1.28 | 2.61% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | 0.627 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 0.845 | -- | -- |
|
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
|
-- | 0.918 | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | 1.252 | -- | -- |
|
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | 2.336 | -- | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | 2.095 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MOO
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLX
VanEck Steel ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URNJ
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HAP or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HAP or CUT?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Natural Resources ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe VanEck Natural Resources ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is HAP or CUT More Risky?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a beta of 0.906, which suggesting that the stock is 9.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.551%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HAP or CUT?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 3.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. VanEck Natural Resources ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HAP or CUT?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Natural Resources ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Natural Resources ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HAP or MOO?
VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Agribusiness ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HAP or MOO?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Agribusiness ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Natural Resources ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Agribusiness ETF, analysts believe VanEck Natural Resources ETF is more attractive than VanEck Agribusiness ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF0 0 0 MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF0 0 0 -
Is HAP or MOO More Risky?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a beta of 0.906, which suggesting that the stock is 9.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Agribusiness ETF has a beta of 0.963, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.712%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HAP or MOO?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. VanEck Agribusiness ETF offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.20 per share. VanEck Natural Resources ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Agribusiness ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HAP or MOO?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Agribusiness ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Agribusiness ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Natural Resources ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Agribusiness ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Natural Resources ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Agribusiness ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- -- MOOVanEck Agribusiness ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HAP or SLX?
VanEck Steel ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Steel ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HAP or SLX?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Steel ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Natural Resources ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Steel ETF, analysts believe VanEck Natural Resources ETF is more attractive than VanEck Steel ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF0 0 0 SLXVanEck Steel ETF0 0 0 -
Is HAP or SLX More Risky?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a beta of 0.906, which suggesting that the stock is 9.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Steel ETF has a beta of 1.428, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.835%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HAP or SLX?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. VanEck Steel ETF offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.08 per share. VanEck Natural Resources ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Steel ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HAP or SLX?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Steel ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Steel ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Natural Resources ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Steel ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Natural Resources ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Steel ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- -- SLXVanEck Steel ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HAP or URNJ?
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- URNJSprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HAP or URNJ?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Natural Resources ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF, analysts believe VanEck Natural Resources ETF is more attractive than Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF0 0 0 URNJSprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is HAP or URNJ More Risky?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a beta of 0.906, which suggesting that the stock is 9.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HAP or URNJ?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. VanEck Natural Resources ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HAP or URNJ?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Natural Resources ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Natural Resources ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- -- URNJSprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HAP or URNM?
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's return on equity of -- beat Sprott Uranium Miners ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- URNMSprott Uranium Miners ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HAP or URNM?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sprott Uranium Miners ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Natural Resources ETF has higher upside potential than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF, analysts believe VanEck Natural Resources ETF is more attractive than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF0 0 0 URNMSprott Uranium Miners ETF0 0 0 -
Is HAP or URNM More Risky?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a beta of 0.906, which suggesting that the stock is 9.381% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sprott Uranium Miners ETF has a beta of 1.126, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.634%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HAP or URNM?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share. VanEck Natural Resources ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HAP or URNM?
VanEck Natural Resources ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Natural Resources ETF's net income of -- is lower than Sprott Uranium Miners ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Natural Resources ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sprott Uranium Miners ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Natural Resources ETF is -- versus -- for Sprott Uranium Miners ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HAPVanEck Natural Resources ETF-- -- -- -- URNMSprott Uranium Miners ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
71
PGY alert for Jul 18
Pagaya Technologies [PGY] is up 4.07% over the past day.
Buy
68
MCRI alert for Jul 18
Monarch Casino & Resort [MCRI] is down 0.76% over the past day.
Sell
41
NEGG alert for Jul 18
Newegg Commerce [NEGG] is up 7.58% over the past day.
