
Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
$10.05 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 10.35% | -- |
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
$11.57 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 5.5% | -- |
EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
|
$12.20 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 5.78% | -- |
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
$18.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 4.86% | -- |
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
$8.99 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 5.91% | -- |
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
|
$10.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 5.21% | -- |
Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -0.150 | -- | -- |
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
-- | -1.157 | -- | -- |
EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
|
-- | -0.993 | -- | -- |
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -1.343 | -- | -- |
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
-- | -2.679 | -- | -- |
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
|
-- | -0.144 | -- | -- |
Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped's return on equity of --.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- |
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
-- | -- | -- |
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped, analysts believe ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a beta of -0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 197.276% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped has a beta of -1.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 297.463%.
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.35%. ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped offers a yield of 5.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped quarterly revenues of --. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped's net income of --. Notably, ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
BZQ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Brazil Capped
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets's return on equity of --.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- |
EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
|
-- | -- | -- |
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets, analysts believe ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a beta of -0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 197.276% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets has a beta of -1.564, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 256.42%.
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.35%. ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets offers a yield of 5.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets quarterly revenues of --. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets's net income of --. Notably, ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
EEV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares Short MidCap400 has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Short MidCap400's return on equity of --.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- |
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- |
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Short MidCap400 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares Short MidCap400, analysts believe ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares Short MidCap400.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a beta of -0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 197.276% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Short MidCap400 has a beta of -1.095, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 209.482%.
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.35%. ProShares Short MidCap400 offers a yield of 4.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Short MidCap400 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Short MidCap400 quarterly revenues of --. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Short MidCap400's net income of --. Notably, ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Short MidCap400's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares Short MidCap400. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraShort MidCap400's return on equity of --.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- |
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- |
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400, analysts believe ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a beta of -0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 197.276% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 has a beta of -2.173, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 317.317%.
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.35%. ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 offers a yield of 5.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 quarterly revenues of --. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraShort MidCap400's net income of --. Notably, ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraShort MidCap400's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
ProShares Short FTSE China 50 has a net margin of -- compared to ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's net margin of --. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Short FTSE China 50's return on equity of --.
Company | Gross Margin | Earnings Per Share | Invested Capital |
---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- |
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- |
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Short FTSE China 50 has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has higher upside potential than ProShares Short FTSE China 50, analysts believe ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 is more attractive than ProShares Short FTSE China 50.
Company | Buy Ratings | Hold Ratings | Sell Ratings |
---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
|
0 | 0 | 0 |
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a beta of -0.973, which suggesting that the stock is 197.276% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Short FTSE China 50 has a beta of -0.511, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.099%.
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.35%. ProShares Short FTSE China 50 offers a yield of 5.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Short FTSE China 50 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Short FTSE China 50 quarterly revenues of --. ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Short FTSE China 50's net income of --. Notably, ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Short FTSE China 50's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 is -- versus -- for ProShares Short FTSE China 50. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company | Price/Sales Ratio | Price/Earnings Ratio | Quarterly Revenue | Quarterly Net Income |
---|---|---|---|---|
FXP
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
YXI
ProShares Short FTSE China 50
|
-- | -- | -- | -- |
Signup to receive the latest stock alerts
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.14% over the past day.
Unity Software [U] is up 7.51% over the past day.