Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Buy
70
CNXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$30.17
Seasonality move
:
5.88%
Day range:
$29.49 - $29.76
52-week range:
$19.91 - $46.00
Dividend yield:
0.14%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.3K
Avg. volume:
9.1K
1-year change:
36.82%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AFK
VanEck Africa Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXDW
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RSX
VanEck Russia ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
$29.58 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.14% | -- |
|
AFK
VanEck Africa Index ETF
|
$20.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 0% | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
$30.60 | -- | -- | -- | $0.97 | 3.16% | -- |
|
GXDW
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF
|
$25.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 0.73% | -- |
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
$18.15 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 1.01% | -- |
|
RSX
VanEck Russia ETF
|
$5.62 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
-- | 0.983 | -- | -- |
|
AFK
VanEck Africa Index ETF
|
-- | 0.967 | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | 0.845 | -- | -- |
|
GXDW
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF
|
-- | 1.106 | -- | -- |
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | 1.407 | -- | -- |
|
RSX
VanEck Russia ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AFK
VanEck Africa Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CUT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXDW
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RSX
VanEck Russia ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck ChiNext ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CNXT or AFK?
VanEck Africa Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck ChiNext ETF's net margin of --. VanEck ChiNext ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Africa Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- AFKVanEck Africa Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CNXT or AFK?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Africa Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck ChiNext ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Africa Index ETF, analysts believe VanEck ChiNext ETF is more attractive than VanEck Africa Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF0 0 0 AFKVanEck Africa Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CNXT or AFK More Risky?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.596% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Africa Index ETF has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.268%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNXT or AFK?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. VanEck Africa Index ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. VanEck ChiNext ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Africa Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNXT or AFK?
VanEck ChiNext ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Africa Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck ChiNext ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Africa Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck ChiNext ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Africa Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck ChiNext ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Africa Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- -- AFKVanEck Africa Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CNXT or CUT?
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck ChiNext ETF's net margin of --. VanEck ChiNext ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CNXT or CUT?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck ChiNext ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF, analysts believe VanEck ChiNext ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF0 0 0 CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF0 0 0 -
Is CNXT or CUT More Risky?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.596% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF has a beta of 0.964, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.551%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNXT or CUT?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.97 per share. VanEck ChiNext ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNXT or CUT?
VanEck ChiNext ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck ChiNext ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck ChiNext ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck ChiNext ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- -- CUTInvesco MSCI Global Timber ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CNXT or GXDW?
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck ChiNext ETF's net margin of --. VanEck ChiNext ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- GXDWGlobal X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CNXT or GXDW?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck ChiNext ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF, analysts believe VanEck ChiNext ETF is more attractive than Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF0 0 0 GXDWGlobal X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF0 0 0 -
Is CNXT or GXDW More Risky?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.596% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF has a beta of 1.318, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.822%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNXT or GXDW?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. VanEck ChiNext ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNXT or GXDW?
VanEck ChiNext ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck ChiNext ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck ChiNext ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck ChiNext ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- -- GXDWGlobal X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CNXT or KURE?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck ChiNext ETF's net margin of --. VanEck ChiNext ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CNXT or KURE?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck ChiNext ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF, analysts believe VanEck ChiNext ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF0 0 0 KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CNXT or KURE More Risky?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.596% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.603%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNXT or KURE?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. VanEck ChiNext ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNXT or KURE?
VanEck ChiNext ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck ChiNext ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck ChiNext ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck ChiNext ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- -- KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CNXT or RSX?
VanEck Russia ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck ChiNext ETF's net margin of --. VanEck ChiNext ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Russia ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- RSXVanEck Russia ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CNXT or RSX?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Russia ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck ChiNext ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Russia ETF, analysts believe VanEck ChiNext ETF is more attractive than VanEck Russia ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF0 0 0 RSXVanEck Russia ETF0 0 0 -
Is CNXT or RSX More Risky?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a beta of 0.694, which suggesting that the stock is 30.596% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Russia ETF has a beta of 0.580, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.955%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CNXT or RSX?
VanEck ChiNext ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.14%. VanEck Russia ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. VanEck ChiNext ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Russia ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CNXT or RSX?
VanEck ChiNext ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Russia ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck ChiNext ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Russia ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck ChiNext ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Russia ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck ChiNext ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Russia ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CNXTVanEck ChiNext ETF-- -- -- -- RSXVanEck Russia ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
82
SBET alert for Jul 17
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 2.6% over the past day.
Buy
89
EXOD alert for Jul 17
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 4.14% over the past day.
Buy
60
U alert for Jul 17
Unity Software [U] is up 7.51% over the past day.
