VIK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Carnival has a net margin of -11.76% compared to Viking Holdings's net margin of 8.93%. Viking Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Carnival's return on equity of 28.79%.

Viking Holdings has a consensus price target of $57.17, signalling upside risk potential of 0.53%. On the other hand Carnival has an analysts' consensus of $30.98 which suggests that it could grow by 6.68%. Given that Carnival has higher upside potential than Viking Holdings, analysts believe Carnival is more attractive than Viking Holdings.

Viking Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carnival has a beta of 2.606, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 160.563%.

Viking Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Carnival offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viking Holdings pays 12.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Carnival pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viking Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viking Holdings quarterly revenues are $897.1M, which are smaller than Carnival quarterly revenues of $6.3B. Viking Holdings's net income of -$105.5M is lower than Carnival's net income of $565M. Notably, Viking Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.24x while Carnival's PE ratio is 15.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viking Holdings is 4.35x versus 1.54x for Carnival. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of -11.76% compared to Viking Holdings's net margin of -6.69%. Viking Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 48.92%.

Viking Holdings has a consensus price target of $57.17, signalling upside risk potential of 0.53%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $189.84 which suggests that it could grow by 6.47%. Given that Expedia Group has higher upside potential than Viking Holdings, analysts believe Expedia Group is more attractive than Viking Holdings.

Viking Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.574, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.436%.

Viking Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Viking Holdings pays 12.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viking Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viking Holdings quarterly revenues are $897.1M, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3B. Viking Holdings's net income of -$105.5M is higher than Expedia Group's net income of -$200M. Notably, Viking Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.24x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 21.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viking Holdings is 4.35x versus 1.74x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Caribbean Group has a net margin of -11.76% compared to Viking Holdings's net margin of 18.26%. Viking Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Royal Caribbean Group's return on equity of 46.91%.

Viking Holdings has a consensus price target of $57.17, signalling upside risk potential of 0.53%. On the other hand Royal Caribbean Group has an analysts' consensus of $298.68 which suggests that it could fall by -11.95%. Given that Viking Holdings has higher upside potential than Royal Caribbean Group, analysts believe Viking Holdings is more attractive than Royal Caribbean Group.

Viking Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.172, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.222%.

Viking Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Royal Caribbean Group offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Viking Holdings pays 12.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Caribbean Group pays out 3.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viking Holdings quarterly revenues are $897.1M, which are smaller than Royal Caribbean Group quarterly revenues of $4B. Viking Holdings's net income of -$105.5M is lower than Royal Caribbean Group's net income of $730M. Notably, Viking Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.24x while Royal Caribbean Group's PE ratio is 28.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viking Holdings is 4.35x versus 5.55x for Royal Caribbean Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tripadvisor has a net margin of -11.76% compared to Viking Holdings's net margin of -2.76%. Viking Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Tripadvisor's return on equity of 6.29%.

Viking Holdings has a consensus price target of $57.17, signalling upside risk potential of 0.53%. On the other hand Tripadvisor has an analysts' consensus of $17.33 which suggests that it could fall by -1.76%. Given that Viking Holdings has higher upside potential than Tripadvisor, analysts believe Viking Holdings is more attractive than Tripadvisor.

Viking Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.283, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.254%.

Viking Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tripadvisor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Viking Holdings pays 12.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Tripadvisor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Viking Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Viking Holdings quarterly revenues are $897.1M, which are larger than Tripadvisor quarterly revenues of $398M. Viking Holdings's net income of -$105.5M is lower than Tripadvisor's net income of -$11M. Notably, Viking Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.24x while Tripadvisor's PE ratio is 47.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Viking Holdings is 4.35x versus 1.38x for Tripadvisor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.