UTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Adtalem Global Education has a net margin of 5.52% compared to Universal Technical Institute's net margin of 13.05%. Universal Technical Institute's return on equity of 21.98% beat Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 16.71%.

Universal Technical Institute has a consensus price target of $37.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.18%. On the other hand Adtalem Global Education has an analysts' consensus of $143.25 which suggests that it could grow by 22.94%. Given that Adtalem Global Education has higher upside potential than Universal Technical Institute, analysts believe Adtalem Global Education is more attractive than Universal Technical Institute.

Universal Technical Institute has a beta of 1.577, which suggesting that the stock is 57.703% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.008%.

Universal Technical Institute has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Adtalem Global Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Technical Institute pays 2.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Adtalem Global Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Technical Institute's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Technical Institute quarterly revenues are $207.4M, which are smaller than Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues of $466.1M. Universal Technical Institute's net income of $11.4M is lower than Adtalem Global Education's net income of $60.8M. Notably, Universal Technical Institute's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.63x while Adtalem Global Education's PE ratio is 19.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Technical Institute is 2.26x versus 2.58x for Adtalem Global Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of 5.52% compared to Universal Technical Institute's net margin of 1.65%. Universal Technical Institute's return on equity of 21.98% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04%.

Universal Technical Institute has a consensus price target of $37.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.18%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could grow by 14.11%. Given that Universal Technical Institute has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services, analysts believe Universal Technical Institute is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services.

Universal Technical Institute has a beta of 1.577, which suggesting that the stock is 57.703% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.42%.

Universal Technical Institute has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Technical Institute pays 2.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Technical Institute's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Technical Institute quarterly revenues are $207.4M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Universal Technical Institute's net income of $11.4M is higher than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Universal Technical Institute's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.63x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 57.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Technical Institute is 2.26x versus 1.54x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grand Canyon Education has a net margin of 5.52% compared to Universal Technical Institute's net margin of 24.76%. Universal Technical Institute's return on equity of 21.98% beat Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.87%.

Universal Technical Institute has a consensus price target of $37.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.18%. On the other hand Grand Canyon Education has an analysts' consensus of $213.33 which suggests that it could grow by 25.96%. Given that Grand Canyon Education has higher upside potential than Universal Technical Institute, analysts believe Grand Canyon Education is more attractive than Universal Technical Institute.

Universal Technical Institute has a beta of 1.577, which suggesting that the stock is 57.703% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.608%.

Universal Technical Institute has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Grand Canyon Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Universal Technical Institute pays 2.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Canyon Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Technical Institute's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Technical Institute quarterly revenues are $207.4M, which are smaller than Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues of $289.3M. Universal Technical Institute's net income of $11.4M is lower than Grand Canyon Education's net income of $71.6M. Notably, Universal Technical Institute's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.63x while Grand Canyon Education's PE ratio is 21.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Technical Institute is 2.26x versus 4.69x for Grand Canyon Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Education has a net margin of 5.52% compared to Universal Technical Institute's net margin of 9.8%. Universal Technical Institute's return on equity of 21.98% beat Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.76%.

Universal Technical Institute has a consensus price target of $37.33, signalling upside risk potential of 17.18%. On the other hand Strategic Education has an analysts' consensus of $102.67 which suggests that it could grow by 29.37%. Given that Strategic Education has higher upside potential than Universal Technical Institute, analysts believe Strategic Education is more attractive than Universal Technical Institute.

Universal Technical Institute has a beta of 1.577, which suggesting that the stock is 57.703% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Education has a beta of 0.524, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.624%.

Universal Technical Institute has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strategic Education offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Universal Technical Institute pays 2.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education pays out 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Technical Institute quarterly revenues are $207.4M, which are smaller than Strategic Education quarterly revenues of $303.6M. Universal Technical Institute's net income of $11.4M is lower than Strategic Education's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Universal Technical Institute's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.63x while Strategic Education's PE ratio is 16.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Technical Institute is 2.26x versus 1.55x for Strategic Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.