UNFI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of -0.09% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of 1.08%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.15% beat The Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 12.93%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of $25.71, signalling downside risk potential of -3.71%. On the other hand The Chefs' Warehouse has an analysts' consensus of $71.29 which suggests that it could grow by 10.69%. Given that The Chefs' Warehouse has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe The Chefs' Warehouse is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.822, which suggesting that the stock is 17.783% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.744, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.429%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Chefs' Warehouse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Chefs' Warehouse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than The Chefs' Warehouse quarterly revenues of $950.7M. United Natural Foods's net income of -$7M is lower than The Chefs' Warehouse's net income of $10.3M. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Chefs' Warehouse's PE ratio is 42.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 0.77x for The Chefs' Warehouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of -0.09% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of -0.26%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.15% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 1.34%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of $25.71, signalling downside risk potential of -3.71%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.822, which suggesting that the stock is 17.783% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.559, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.088%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $619.5M. United Natural Foods's net income of -$7M is lower than Amcon Distributing's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 46.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JM Smucker has a net margin of -0.09% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of -34.01%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.15% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of -17.05%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of $25.71, signalling downside risk potential of -3.71%. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $110.74 which suggests that it could grow by 2.92%. Given that JM Smucker has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe JM Smucker is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.822, which suggesting that the stock is 17.783% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.139%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 4.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out -37% of its earnings as a dividend.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.1B. United Natural Foods's net income of -$7M is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$729M. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 1.31x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SpartanNash has a net margin of -0.09% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of 0.07%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.15% beat SpartanNash's return on equity of -1.38%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of $25.71, signalling downside risk potential of -3.71%. On the other hand SpartanNash has an analysts' consensus of $26.90 which suggests that it could grow by 1.24%. Given that SpartanNash has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe SpartanNash is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.822, which suggesting that the stock is 17.783% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SpartanNash has a beta of 0.445, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.478%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SpartanNash offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash pays out 10003.01% of its earnings as a dividend.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than SpartanNash quarterly revenues of $2.9B. United Natural Foods's net income of -$7M is lower than SpartanNash's net income of $2.1M. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SpartanNash's PE ratio is 15.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 0.09x for SpartanNash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.