TNC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Tennant's net margin of 7.52%. Tennant's return on equity of 10.9% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 8.41%.

Tennant has a consensus price target of $120.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.43%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $273.22 which suggests that it could grow by 3.63%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than L3Harris Technologies, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than L3Harris Technologies.

Tennant has a beta of 1.047, which suggesting that the stock is 4.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.749, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.094%.

Tennant has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Tennant pays 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tennant quarterly revenues are $290M, which are smaller than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Tennant's net income of $13.1M is lower than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $386M. Notably, Tennant's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.28x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 31.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tennant is 1.20x versus 2.36x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Megola has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Tennant's net margin of --. Tennant's return on equity of 10.9% beat Megola's return on equity of --.

Tennant has a consensus price target of $120.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.43%. On the other hand Megola has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Megola, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Megola.

Tennant has a beta of 1.047, which suggesting that the stock is 4.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Megola has a beta of 1.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.217%.

Tennant has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Megola offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tennant pays 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Megola pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tennant quarterly revenues are $290M, which are larger than Megola quarterly revenues of --. Tennant's net income of $13.1M is higher than Megola's net income of --. Notably, Tennant's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.28x while Megola's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tennant is 1.20x versus -- for Megola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Megatech has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Tennant's net margin of --. Tennant's return on equity of 10.9% beat Megatech's return on equity of --.

Tennant has a consensus price target of $120.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.43%. On the other hand Megatech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Megatech, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Megatech.

Tennant has a beta of 1.047, which suggesting that the stock is 4.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Megatech has a beta of -1.243, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 224.281%.

Tennant has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Megatech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tennant pays 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Megatech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tennant's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tennant quarterly revenues are $290M, which are larger than Megatech quarterly revenues of --. Tennant's net income of $13.1M is higher than Megatech's net income of --. Notably, Tennant's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.28x while Megatech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tennant is 1.20x versus -- for Megatech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Standex International has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Tennant's net margin of 10.53%. Tennant's return on equity of 10.9% beat Standex International's return on equity of 9.18%.

Tennant has a consensus price target of $120.00, signalling upside risk potential of 50.43%. On the other hand Standex International has an analysts' consensus of $197.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.78%. Given that Tennant has higher upside potential than Standex International, analysts believe Tennant is more attractive than Standex International.

Tennant has a beta of 1.047, which suggesting that the stock is 4.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standex International has a beta of 1.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.394%.

Tennant has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Standex International offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Tennant pays 25.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Standex International pays out 19.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tennant quarterly revenues are $290M, which are larger than Standex International quarterly revenues of $207.8M. Tennant's net income of $13.1M is lower than Standex International's net income of $21.9M. Notably, Tennant's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.28x while Standex International's PE ratio is 30.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tennant is 1.20x versus 2.47x for Standex International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.