SMP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Standard Motor Products's net margin of 0.65%. Standard Motor Products's return on equity of 4.81% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Standard Motor Products has a consensus price target of $40.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.54%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.39%. Given that Standard Motor Products has higher upside potential than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, analysts believe Standard Motor Products is more attractive than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings.

Standard Motor Products has a beta of 0.653, which suggesting that the stock is 34.654% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 2.646, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.59%.

Standard Motor Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Standard Motor Products pays 92.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Standard Motor Products quarterly revenues are $413.4M, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $179.7M. Standard Motor Products's net income of $12.6M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Standard Motor Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.23x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Standard Motor Products is 0.47x versus 1.04x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stoneridge has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Standard Motor Products's net margin of -3.3%. Standard Motor Products's return on equity of 4.81% beat Stoneridge's return on equity of -6.68%.

Standard Motor Products has a consensus price target of $40.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.54%. On the other hand Stoneridge has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 96.08%. Given that Stoneridge has higher upside potential than Standard Motor Products, analysts believe Stoneridge is more attractive than Standard Motor Products.

Standard Motor Products has a beta of 0.653, which suggesting that the stock is 34.654% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stoneridge has a beta of 1.420, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.039%.

Standard Motor Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Stoneridge offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Standard Motor Products pays 92.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Stoneridge pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Standard Motor Products quarterly revenues are $413.4M, which are larger than Stoneridge quarterly revenues of $217.9M. Standard Motor Products's net income of $12.6M is higher than Stoneridge's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Standard Motor Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.23x while Stoneridge's PE ratio is 204.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Standard Motor Products is 0.47x versus 0.22x for Stoneridge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentherm has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Standard Motor Products's net margin of -0.04%. Standard Motor Products's return on equity of 4.81% beat Gentherm's return on equity of 7.79%.

Standard Motor Products has a consensus price target of $40.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.54%. On the other hand Gentherm has an analysts' consensus of $39.40 which suggests that it could grow by 26.65%. Given that Gentherm has higher upside potential than Standard Motor Products, analysts believe Gentherm is more attractive than Standard Motor Products.

Standard Motor Products has a beta of 0.653, which suggesting that the stock is 34.654% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentherm has a beta of 1.419, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.9%.

Standard Motor Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Gentherm offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Standard Motor Products pays 92.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentherm pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Standard Motor Products quarterly revenues are $413.4M, which are larger than Gentherm quarterly revenues of $353.9M. Standard Motor Products's net income of $12.6M is higher than Gentherm's net income of -$128K. Notably, Standard Motor Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.23x while Gentherm's PE ratio is 19.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Standard Motor Products is 0.47x versus 0.67x for Gentherm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Standard Motor Products's net margin of 2.12%. Standard Motor Products's return on equity of 4.81% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Standard Motor Products has a consensus price target of $40.50, signalling upside risk potential of 24.54%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.17 which suggests that it could fall by -5.44%. Given that Standard Motor Products has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Standard Motor Products is more attractive than Tesla.

Standard Motor Products has a beta of 0.653, which suggesting that the stock is 34.654% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.423%.

Standard Motor Products has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.69%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Standard Motor Products pays 92.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Standard Motor Products quarterly revenues are $413.4M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Standard Motor Products's net income of $12.6M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Standard Motor Products's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.23x while Tesla's PE ratio is 176.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Standard Motor Products is 0.47x versus 11.78x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.