RNG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Applied Digital has a net margin of -1.69% compared to RingCentral's net margin of -67.19%. RingCentral's return on equity of -- beat Applied Digital's return on equity of -85.7%.

RingCentral has a consensus price target of $34.34, signalling upside risk potential of 31.62%. On the other hand Applied Digital has an analysts' consensus of $14.6111 which suggests that it could grow by 45.24%. Given that Applied Digital has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe Applied Digital is more attractive than RingCentral.

RingCentral has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Digital has a beta of 5.843, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 484.302%.

RingCentral has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Applied Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RingCentral pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RingCentral quarterly revenues are $612.1M, which are larger than Applied Digital quarterly revenues of $52.9M. RingCentral's net income of -$10.3M is higher than Applied Digital's net income of -$35.6M. Notably, RingCentral's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Applied Digital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RingCentral is 0.98x versus 8.01x for Applied Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sabre has a net margin of -1.69% compared to RingCentral's net margin of 4.55%. RingCentral's return on equity of -- beat Sabre's return on equity of --.

RingCentral has a consensus price target of $34.34, signalling upside risk potential of 31.62%. On the other hand Sabre has an analysts' consensus of $4.66 which suggests that it could grow by 53.34%. Given that Sabre has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe Sabre is more attractive than RingCentral.

RingCentral has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sabre has a beta of 1.400, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.013%.

RingCentral has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sabre offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RingCentral pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sabre pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RingCentral quarterly revenues are $612.1M, which are smaller than Sabre quarterly revenues of $776.6M. RingCentral's net income of -$10.3M is lower than Sabre's net income of $35.3M. Notably, RingCentral's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sabre's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RingCentral is 0.98x versus 0.40x for Sabre. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twilio has a net margin of -1.69% compared to RingCentral's net margin of 1.71%. RingCentral's return on equity of -- beat Twilio's return on equity of -0.4%.

RingCentral has a consensus price target of $34.34, signalling upside risk potential of 31.62%. On the other hand Twilio has an analysts' consensus of $130.71 which suggests that it could grow by 7%. Given that RingCentral has higher upside potential than Twilio, analysts believe RingCentral is more attractive than Twilio.

RingCentral has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twilio has a beta of 1.302, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.173%.

RingCentral has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twilio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RingCentral pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twilio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RingCentral quarterly revenues are $612.1M, which are smaller than Twilio quarterly revenues of $1.2B. RingCentral's net income of -$10.3M is lower than Twilio's net income of $20M. Notably, RingCentral's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twilio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RingCentral is 0.98x versus 4.30x for Twilio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -1.69% compared to RingCentral's net margin of -2.12%. RingCentral's return on equity of -- beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

RingCentral has a consensus price target of $34.34, signalling upside risk potential of 31.62%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 135.85%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than RingCentral.

RingCentral has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.603, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.329%.

RingCentral has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RingCentral pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RingCentral quarterly revenues are $612.1M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. RingCentral's net income of -$10.3M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, RingCentral's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RingCentral is 0.98x versus 0.21x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.