QTWO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BILL Holdings has a net margin of 2.51% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of -3.24%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -3.98% beat BILL Holdings's return on equity of 0.97%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $101.26, signalling upside risk potential of 12%. On the other hand BILL Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $63.31 which suggests that it could grow by 37.93%. Given that BILL Holdings has higher upside potential than Q2 Holdings, analysts believe BILL Holdings is more attractive than Q2 Holdings.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.485, which suggesting that the stock is 48.51% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BILL Holdings has a beta of 1.349, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.942%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BILL Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BILL Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $189.7M, which are smaller than BILL Holdings quarterly revenues of $358.2M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $4.8M is higher than BILL Holdings's net income of -$11.6M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BILL Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 7.71x versus 3.39x for BILL Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cerence has a net margin of 2.51% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of 27.76%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -3.98% beat Cerence's return on equity of -163.61%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $101.26, signalling upside risk potential of 12%. On the other hand Cerence has an analysts' consensus of $11.60 which suggests that it could grow by 26.78%. Given that Cerence has higher upside potential than Q2 Holdings, analysts believe Cerence is more attractive than Q2 Holdings.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.485, which suggesting that the stock is 48.51% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cerence has a beta of 2.813, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 181.255%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cerence offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cerence pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $189.7M, which are larger than Cerence quarterly revenues of $78M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $4.8M is lower than Cerence's net income of $21.7M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cerence's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 7.71x versus 1.60x for Cerence. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CommVault Systems has a net margin of 2.51% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of 11.27%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -3.98% beat CommVault Systems's return on equity of 26.23%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $101.26, signalling upside risk potential of 12%. On the other hand CommVault Systems has an analysts' consensus of $188.99 which suggests that it could grow by 11.95%. Given that Q2 Holdings has higher upside potential than CommVault Systems, analysts believe Q2 Holdings is more attractive than CommVault Systems.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.485, which suggesting that the stock is 48.51% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.373%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CommVault Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CommVault Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $189.7M, which are smaller than CommVault Systems quarterly revenues of $275M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $4.8M is lower than CommVault Systems's net income of $31M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CommVault Systems's PE ratio is 99.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 7.71x versus 7.65x for CommVault Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ncino has a net margin of 2.51% compared to Q2 Holdings's net margin of 3.86%. Q2 Holdings's return on equity of -3.98% beat Ncino's return on equity of -2.71%.

Q2 Holdings has a consensus price target of $101.26, signalling upside risk potential of 12%. On the other hand Ncino has an analysts' consensus of $31.21 which suggests that it could grow by 3.91%. Given that Q2 Holdings has higher upside potential than Ncino, analysts believe Q2 Holdings is more attractive than Ncino.

Q2 Holdings has a beta of 1.485, which suggesting that the stock is 48.51% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ncino has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Q2 Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ncino offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Q2 Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ncino pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Q2 Holdings quarterly revenues are $189.7M, which are larger than Ncino quarterly revenues of $144.1M. Q2 Holdings's net income of $4.8M is lower than Ncino's net income of $5.6M. Notably, Q2 Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ncino's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Q2 Holdings is 7.71x versus 6.25x for Ncino. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.