PL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intuitive Machines has a net margin of -19.06% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -18.23%. Planet Labs PBC's return on equity of -22.92% beat Intuitive Machines's return on equity of -362.52%.

Planet Labs PBC has a consensus price target of $7.01, signalling upside risk potential of 8.67%. On the other hand Intuitive Machines has an analysts' consensus of $14.88 which suggests that it could grow by 32.58%. Given that Intuitive Machines has higher upside potential than Planet Labs PBC, analysts believe Intuitive Machines is more attractive than Planet Labs PBC.

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuitive Machines has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Planet Labs PBC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuitive Machines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Labs PBC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuitive Machines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Labs PBC quarterly revenues are $66.3M, which are larger than Intuitive Machines quarterly revenues of $62.5M. Planet Labs PBC's net income of -$12.6M is lower than Intuitive Machines's net income of -$11.4M. Notably, Planet Labs PBC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intuitive Machines's PE ratio is 10.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Labs PBC is 7.61x versus 4.18x for Intuitive Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Momentus has a net margin of -19.06% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -1916.77%. Planet Labs PBC's return on equity of -22.92% beat Momentus's return on equity of -4939.96%.

Planet Labs PBC has a consensus price target of $7.01, signalling upside risk potential of 8.67%. On the other hand Momentus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56580.14%. Given that Momentus has higher upside potential than Planet Labs PBC, analysts believe Momentus is more attractive than Planet Labs PBC.

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Momentus has a beta of 1.132, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.226%.

Planet Labs PBC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Momentus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Labs PBC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Momentus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Labs PBC quarterly revenues are $66.3M, which are larger than Momentus quarterly revenues of $322K. Planet Labs PBC's net income of -$12.6M is lower than Momentus's net income of -$6.2M. Notably, Planet Labs PBC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Momentus's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Labs PBC is 7.61x versus 1.44x for Momentus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Outdoor Holding has a net margin of -19.06% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -22.81%. Planet Labs PBC's return on equity of -22.92% beat Outdoor Holding's return on equity of -42.12%.

Planet Labs PBC has a consensus price target of $7.01, signalling upside risk potential of 8.67%. On the other hand Outdoor Holding has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 41.67%. Given that Outdoor Holding has higher upside potential than Planet Labs PBC, analysts believe Outdoor Holding is more attractive than Planet Labs PBC.

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Outdoor Holding has a beta of 1.090, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.017%.

Planet Labs PBC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Outdoor Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Labs PBC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Outdoor Holding pays out -2.27% of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Labs PBC quarterly revenues are $66.3M, which are larger than Outdoor Holding quarterly revenues of -$42.2M. Planet Labs PBC's net income of -$12.6M is higher than Outdoor Holding's net income of -$77.5M. Notably, Planet Labs PBC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Outdoor Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Labs PBC is 7.61x versus 2.86x for Outdoor Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sidus Space has a net margin of -19.06% compared to Planet Labs PBC's net margin of -2689.64%. Planet Labs PBC's return on equity of -22.92% beat Sidus Space's return on equity of -121.5%.

Planet Labs PBC has a consensus price target of $7.01, signalling upside risk potential of 8.67%. On the other hand Sidus Space has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 449.45%. Given that Sidus Space has higher upside potential than Planet Labs PBC, analysts believe Sidus Space is more attractive than Planet Labs PBC.

Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sidus Space has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Planet Labs PBC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sidus Space offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Planet Labs PBC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sidus Space pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Planet Labs PBC quarterly revenues are $66.3M, which are larger than Sidus Space quarterly revenues of $238.5K. Planet Labs PBC's net income of -$12.6M is lower than Sidus Space's net income of -$6.4M. Notably, Planet Labs PBC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sidus Space's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Planet Labs PBC is 7.61x versus 5.03x for Sidus Space. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.