NWN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ONE Gas has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 12.77%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 7.47% beat ONE Gas's return on equity of 8.23%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $50.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.9%. On the other hand ONE Gas has an analysts' consensus of $77.75 which suggests that it could grow by 6.3%. Given that Northwest Natural Holding has higher upside potential than ONE Gas, analysts believe Northwest Natural Holding is more attractive than ONE Gas.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.532, which suggesting that the stock is 46.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ONE Gas has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.042%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.69%. ONE Gas offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. ONE Gas pays out 67.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $494.3M, which are smaller than ONE Gas quarterly revenues of $935.2M. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $87.9M is lower than ONE Gas's net income of $119.4M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.58x while ONE Gas's PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.35x versus 1.87x for ONE Gas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 2.79%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 7.47% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.41%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $50.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.9%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $4.75 which suggests that it could grow by 90%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Northwest Natural Holding, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Northwest Natural Holding.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.532, which suggesting that the stock is 46.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.69%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Northwest Natural Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $494.3M, which are larger than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $85.4M. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $87.9M is higher than OPAL Fuels's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.58x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 125.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.35x versus 0.22x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RGC Resources has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 21.05%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 7.47% beat RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.89%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $50.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.9%. On the other hand RGC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.68%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Northwest Natural Holding, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Northwest Natural Holding.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.532, which suggesting that the stock is 46.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RGC Resources has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.721%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.69%. RGC Resources offers a yield of 3.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $494.3M, which are larger than RGC Resources quarterly revenues of $36.5M. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $87.9M is higher than RGC Resources's net income of $7.7M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.58x while RGC Resources's PE ratio is 17.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.35x versus 2.45x for RGC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UGI has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Northwest Natural Holding's net margin of 17.97%. Northwest Natural Holding's return on equity of 7.47% beat UGI's return on equity of 11.35%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a consensus price target of $50.50, signalling upside risk potential of 20.9%. On the other hand UGI has an analysts' consensus of $39.75 which suggests that it could grow by 10.36%. Given that Northwest Natural Holding has higher upside potential than UGI, analysts believe Northwest Natural Holding is more attractive than UGI.

Northwest Natural Holding has a beta of 0.532, which suggesting that the stock is 46.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UGI has a beta of 1.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.422%.

Northwest Natural Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.69%. UGI offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Northwest Natural Holding pays 92.37% of its earnings as a dividend. UGI pays out 118.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Northwest Natural Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but UGI's is not.

Northwest Natural Holding quarterly revenues are $494.3M, which are smaller than UGI quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Northwest Natural Holding's net income of $87.9M is lower than UGI's net income of $479M. Notably, Northwest Natural Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.58x while UGI's PE ratio is 14.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northwest Natural Holding is 1.35x versus 1.06x for UGI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.