Will GoodRX Stock Bounce Back?
GoodRX (NASDAQ:GDRX) tracks prescription drug prices and its model was…
Buy
64
MUSE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$50.24
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$50.11 - $50.11
52-week range:
$48.00 - $50.55
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
118
Avg. volume:
74
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUSE
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DMX
DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NBFC
Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCM
Pcm Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RIGS
ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUSE
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF
|
$50.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 0% | -- |
|
DMX
DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF
|
$50.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 0% | -- |
|
NBFC
Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF
|
$51.11 | -- | -- | -- | $0.31 | 0% | -- |
|
PCM
Pcm Fund
|
$6.29 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 13.51% | -- |
|
RIGS
ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund
|
$22.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 4.75% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUSE
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
DMX
DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
NBFC
Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF
|
-- | 0.501 | -- | -- |
|
PCM
Pcm Fund
|
-- | 0.476 | -- | -- |
|
RIGS
ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund
|
-- | 0.679 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MUSE
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DMX
DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NBFC
Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PCM
Pcm Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RIGS
ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MUSE or DMX?
DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's net margin of --. TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUSETCW Multisector Credit Income ETF-- -- -- DMXDoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUSE or DMX?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has higher upside potential than DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF, analysts believe TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF is more attractive than DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUSETCW Multisector Credit Income ETF0 0 0 DMXDoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUSE or DMX More Risky?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUSE or DMX?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUSE or DMX?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF is -- versus -- for DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUSETCW Multisector Credit Income ETF-- -- -- -- DMXDoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUSE or NBFC?
Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's net margin of --. TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUSETCW Multisector Credit Income ETF-- -- -- NBFCNeuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUSE or NBFC?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has higher upside potential than Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF, analysts believe TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF is more attractive than Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUSETCW Multisector Credit Income ETF0 0 0 NBFCNeuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is MUSE or NBFC More Risky?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUSE or NBFC?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUSE or NBFC?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF is -- versus -- for Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUSETCW Multisector Credit Income ETF-- -- -- -- NBFCNeuberger Berman Flexible Credit Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUSE or PCM?
Pcm Fund has a net margin of -- compared to TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's net margin of --. TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pcm Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUSETCW Multisector Credit Income ETF-- -- -- PCMPcm Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUSE or PCM?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pcm Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has higher upside potential than Pcm Fund, analysts believe TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF is more attractive than Pcm Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUSETCW Multisector Credit Income ETF0 0 0 PCMPcm Fund0 0 0 -
Is MUSE or PCM More Risky?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pcm Fund has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.267%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUSE or PCM?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pcm Fund offers a yield of 13.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pcm Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUSE or PCM?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pcm Fund quarterly revenues of --. TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pcm Fund's net income of --. Notably, TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pcm Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF is -- versus -- for Pcm Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUSETCW Multisector Credit Income ETF-- -- -- -- PCMPcm Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns MUSE or RIGS?
ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's net margin of --. TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MUSETCW Multisector Credit Income ETF-- -- -- RIGSALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About MUSE or RIGS?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has higher upside potential than ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund, analysts believe TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF is more attractive than ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MUSETCW Multisector Credit Income ETF0 0 0 RIGSALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is MUSE or RIGS More Risky?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.654, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.626%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MUSE or RIGS?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund offers a yield of 4.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MUSE or RIGS?
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF is -- versus -- for ALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MUSETCW Multisector Credit Income ETF-- -- -- -- RIGSALPS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will FCX Benefit From Tariffs?
Freeport-McMoRan (NYSE:FCX) is among the world’s largest producers of copper…
Can Levi Stock Double?
Levi Strauss (NYSE:LEVI) is among the oldest clothing brands in…
Stock Ideas
Buy
71
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 59x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
80
SOC alert for Jul 18
Sable Offshore [SOC] is up 11.86% over the past day.
Buy
71
PGY alert for Jul 18
Pagaya Technologies [PGY] is up 5.56% over the past day.
Buy
68
MCRI alert for Jul 18
Monarch Casino & Resort [MCRI] is up 0.31% over the past day.
