MSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlueLinx Holdings has a net margin of 5.85% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of 0.4%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 14.3% beat BlueLinx Holdings's return on equity of 5.92%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of $88.84, signalling upside risk potential of 2.67%. On the other hand BlueLinx Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $91.25 which suggests that it could grow by 11.98%. Given that BlueLinx Holdings has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe BlueLinx Holdings is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.877, which suggesting that the stock is 12.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlueLinx Holdings has a beta of 1.897, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.744%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.93%. BlueLinx Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. BlueLinx Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $971.1M, which are larger than BlueLinx Holdings quarterly revenues of $709.2M. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $56.8M is higher than BlueLinx Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.44x while BlueLinx Holdings's PE ratio is 18.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.29x versus 0.24x for BlueLinx Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Distribution Solutions Group has a net margin of 5.85% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of 0.68%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 14.3% beat Distribution Solutions Group's return on equity of 0.18%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of $88.84, signalling upside risk potential of 2.67%. On the other hand Distribution Solutions Group has an analysts' consensus of $37.50 which suggests that it could grow by 32.79%. Given that Distribution Solutions Group has higher upside potential than MSC Industrial Direct, analysts believe Distribution Solutions Group is more attractive than MSC Industrial Direct.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.877, which suggesting that the stock is 12.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Distribution Solutions Group has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.378%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.93%. Distribution Solutions Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Distribution Solutions Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $971.1M, which are larger than Distribution Solutions Group quarterly revenues of $478M. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $56.8M is higher than Distribution Solutions Group's net income of $3.3M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.44x while Distribution Solutions Group's PE ratio is 1,412.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.29x versus 0.72x for Distribution Solutions Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DXP Enterprises has a net margin of 5.85% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of 4.32%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 14.3% beat DXP Enterprises's return on equity of 19.64%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of $88.84, signalling upside risk potential of 2.67%. On the other hand DXP Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $95.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.29%. Given that MSC Industrial Direct has higher upside potential than DXP Enterprises, analysts believe MSC Industrial Direct is more attractive than DXP Enterprises.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.877, which suggesting that the stock is 12.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DXP Enterprises has a beta of 1.156, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.594%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.93%. DXP Enterprises offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. DXP Enterprises pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $971.1M, which are larger than DXP Enterprises quarterly revenues of $476.6M. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $56.8M is higher than DXP Enterprises's net income of $20.6M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.44x while DXP Enterprises's PE ratio is 20.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.29x versus 0.86x for DXP Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Resideo Technologies has a net margin of 5.85% compared to MSC Industrial Direct's net margin of 0.34%. MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 14.3% beat Resideo Technologies's return on equity of 2.46%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus price target of $88.84, signalling upside risk potential of 2.67%. On the other hand Resideo Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $23.33 which suggests that it could fall by -0.24%. Given that MSC Industrial Direct has higher upside potential than Resideo Technologies, analysts believe MSC Industrial Direct is more attractive than Resideo Technologies.

MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.877, which suggesting that the stock is 12.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resideo Technologies has a beta of 2.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.03%.

MSC Industrial Direct has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.93%. Resideo Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MSC Industrial Direct pays 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Resideo Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues are $971.1M, which are smaller than Resideo Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.8B. MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $56.8M is higher than Resideo Technologies's net income of $6M. Notably, MSC Industrial Direct's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.44x while Resideo Technologies's PE ratio is 73.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MSC Industrial Direct is 1.29x versus 0.49x for Resideo Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.