MGA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gentherm has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Magna International's net margin of -0.04%. Magna International's return on equity of 9.44% beat Gentherm's return on equity of 7.79%.

Magna International has a consensus price target of $43.07, signalling upside risk potential of 2.34%. On the other hand Gentherm has an analysts' consensus of $39.40 which suggests that it could grow by 26.65%. Given that Gentherm has higher upside potential than Magna International, analysts believe Gentherm is more attractive than Magna International.

Magna International has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.27% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentherm has a beta of 1.419, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.9%.

Magna International has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.56%. Gentherm offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Magna International pays 53.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentherm pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magna International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Magna International quarterly revenues are $10.1B, which are larger than Gentherm quarterly revenues of $353.9M. Magna International's net income of $146M is higher than Gentherm's net income of -$128K. Notably, Magna International's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.52x while Gentherm's PE ratio is 19.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magna International is 0.29x versus 0.67x for Gentherm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Magna International's net margin of 2.12%. Magna International's return on equity of 9.44% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Magna International has a consensus price target of $43.07, signalling upside risk potential of 2.34%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.17 which suggests that it could fall by -5.44%. Given that Magna International has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Magna International is more attractive than Tesla.

Magna International has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.27% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.423%.

Magna International has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.56%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Magna International pays 53.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magna International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Magna International quarterly revenues are $10.1B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Magna International's net income of $146M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Magna International's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.52x while Tesla's PE ratio is 176.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magna International is 0.29x versus 11.78x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies has a net margin of 1.45% compared to Magna International's net margin of -2501.92%. Magna International's return on equity of 9.44% beat Vision Marine Technologies's return on equity of -141.98%.

Magna International has a consensus price target of $43.07, signalling upside risk potential of 2.34%. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $11.01 which suggests that it could grow by 83.79%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies has higher upside potential than Magna International, analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies is more attractive than Magna International.

Magna International has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.27% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Magna International has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.56%. Vision Marine Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Magna International pays 53.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magna International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Magna International quarterly revenues are $10.1B, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies quarterly revenues of $202.9K. Magna International's net income of $146M is higher than Vision Marine Technologies's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Magna International's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.52x while Vision Marine Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Magna International is 0.29x versus 1.66x for Vision Marine Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.