KLG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conagra Brands has a net margin of 2.72% compared to WK Kellogg's net margin of 9.2%. WK Kellogg's return on equity of 17.67% beat Conagra Brands's return on equity of 13.18%.

WK Kellogg has a consensus price target of $22.70, signalling downside risk potential of -2.07%. On the other hand Conagra Brands has an analysts' consensus of $21.76 which suggests that it could grow by 14.28%. Given that Conagra Brands has higher upside potential than WK Kellogg, analysts believe Conagra Brands is more attractive than WK Kellogg.

WK Kellogg has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conagra Brands has a beta of 0.107, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.294%.

WK Kellogg has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Conagra Brands offers a yield of 7.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. WK Kellogg pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Conagra Brands pays out 58.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WK Kellogg quarterly revenues are $663M, which are smaller than Conagra Brands quarterly revenues of $2.8B. WK Kellogg's net income of $18M is lower than Conagra Brands's net income of $256M. Notably, WK Kellogg's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.22x while Conagra Brands's PE ratio is 7.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WK Kellogg is 0.76x versus 0.79x for Conagra Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Mills has a net margin of 2.72% compared to WK Kellogg's net margin of 6.45%. WK Kellogg's return on equity of 17.67% beat General Mills's return on equity of 24.24%.

WK Kellogg has a consensus price target of $22.70, signalling downside risk potential of -2.07%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $55.72 which suggests that it could grow by 11.24%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than WK Kellogg, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than WK Kellogg.

WK Kellogg has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.003, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.692%.

WK Kellogg has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. WK Kellogg pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 58.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WK Kellogg quarterly revenues are $663M, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.6B. WK Kellogg's net income of $18M is lower than General Mills's net income of $294M. Notably, WK Kellogg's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.22x while General Mills's PE ratio is 12.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WK Kellogg is 0.76x versus 1.43x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kellanova has a net margin of 2.72% compared to WK Kellogg's net margin of 9.86%. WK Kellogg's return on equity of 17.67% beat Kellanova's return on equity of 37.56%.

WK Kellogg has a consensus price target of $22.70, signalling downside risk potential of -2.07%. On the other hand Kellanova has an analysts' consensus of $83.40 which suggests that it could grow by 4.58%. Given that Kellanova has higher upside potential than WK Kellogg, analysts believe Kellanova is more attractive than WK Kellogg.

WK Kellogg has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kellanova has a beta of 0.284, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.633%.

WK Kellogg has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Kellanova offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. WK Kellogg pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Kellanova pays out 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WK Kellogg quarterly revenues are $663M, which are smaller than Kellanova quarterly revenues of $3.1B. WK Kellogg's net income of $18M is lower than Kellanova's net income of $304M. Notably, WK Kellogg's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.22x while Kellanova's PE ratio is 20.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WK Kellogg is 0.76x versus 2.19x for Kellanova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 2.72% compared to WK Kellogg's net margin of 11.87%. WK Kellogg's return on equity of 17.67% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

WK Kellogg has a consensus price target of $22.70, signalling downside risk potential of -2.07%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.48 which suggests that it could grow by 14.14%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than WK Kellogg, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than WK Kellogg.

WK Kellogg has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.252, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.802%.

WK Kellogg has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. WK Kellogg pays 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WK Kellogg quarterly revenues are $663M, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. WK Kellogg's net income of $18M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, WK Kellogg's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.22x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 12.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WK Kellogg is 0.76x versus 1.31x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.