KEP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 9.61% compared to Korea Electric Power's net margin of 2.79%. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 13.03% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.41%.

Korea Electric Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -27.9%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $4.75 which suggests that it could grow by 95.47%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Korea Electric Power, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Korea Electric Power.

Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.928, which suggesting that the stock is 7.164% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Korea Electric Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Korea Electric Power pays 3.63% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Korea Electric Power's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

Korea Electric Power quarterly revenues are $16.7B, which are larger than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $85.4M. Korea Electric Power's net income of $1.6B is higher than OPAL Fuels's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Korea Electric Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.65x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 121.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Korea Electric Power is 0.27x versus 0.21x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stem has a net margin of 9.61% compared to Korea Electric Power's net margin of -76.9%. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 13.03% beat Stem's return on equity of -595.48%.

Korea Electric Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -27.9%. On the other hand Stem has an analysts' consensus of $12.60 which suggests that it could grow by 46%. Given that Stem has higher upside potential than Korea Electric Power, analysts believe Stem is more attractive than Korea Electric Power.

Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.928, which suggesting that the stock is 7.164% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stem has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Korea Electric Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Stem offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Korea Electric Power pays 3.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Stem pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Korea Electric Power's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Korea Electric Power quarterly revenues are $16.7B, which are larger than Stem quarterly revenues of $32.5M. Korea Electric Power's net income of $1.6B is higher than Stem's net income of -$25M. Notably, Korea Electric Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.65x while Stem's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Korea Electric Power is 0.27x versus 0.46x for Stem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 9.61% compared to Korea Electric Power's net margin of -21.4%. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 13.03% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of 30.01%.

Korea Electric Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -27.9%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $306.06 which suggests that it could grow by 15.59%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than Korea Electric Power, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than Korea Electric Power.

Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.928, which suggesting that the stock is 7.164% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Korea Electric Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Korea Electric Power pays 3.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Korea Electric Power's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Korea Electric Power quarterly revenues are $16.7B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $631M. Korea Electric Power's net income of $1.6B is higher than Talen Energy's net income of -$135M. Notably, Korea Electric Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.65x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is 27.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Korea Electric Power is 0.27x versus 6.71x for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eco Wave Power Global AB has a net margin of 9.61% compared to Korea Electric Power's net margin of -313.69%. Korea Electric Power's return on equity of 13.03% beat Eco Wave Power Global AB's return on equity of -29.13%.

Korea Electric Power has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -27.9%. On the other hand Eco Wave Power Global AB has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 127.96%. Given that Eco Wave Power Global AB has higher upside potential than Korea Electric Power, analysts believe Eco Wave Power Global AB is more attractive than Korea Electric Power.

Korea Electric Power has a beta of 0.928, which suggesting that the stock is 7.164% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eco Wave Power Global AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Korea Electric Power has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.54%. Eco Wave Power Global AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Korea Electric Power pays 3.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Eco Wave Power Global AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Korea Electric Power's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Korea Electric Power quarterly revenues are $16.7B, which are larger than Eco Wave Power Global AB quarterly revenues of $168K. Korea Electric Power's net income of $1.6B is higher than Eco Wave Power Global AB's net income of -$499K. Notably, Korea Electric Power's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.65x while Eco Wave Power Global AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Korea Electric Power is 0.27x versus -- for Eco Wave Power Global AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.