IT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aurora Innovation has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Gartner's net margin of --. Gartner's return on equity of 118.61% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity of --.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $480.82, signalling upside risk potential of 32.25%. On the other hand Aurora Innovation has an analysts' consensus of $10.51 which suggests that it could grow by 73.43%. Given that Aurora Innovation has higher upside potential than Gartner, analysts believe Aurora Innovation is more attractive than Gartner.

Gartner has a beta of 1.192, which suggesting that the stock is 19.152% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aurora Innovation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aurora Innovation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aurora Innovation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Aurora Innovation quarterly revenues of --. Gartner's net income of $210.9M is higher than Aurora Innovation's net income of -$208M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.62x while Aurora Innovation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 4.48x versus 148.85x for Aurora Innovation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leidos Holdings has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Gartner's net margin of 8.55%. Gartner's return on equity of 118.61% beat Leidos Holdings's return on equity of 29.95%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $480.82, signalling upside risk potential of 32.25%. On the other hand Leidos Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $172.89 which suggests that it could grow by 7.36%. Given that Gartner has higher upside potential than Leidos Holdings, analysts believe Gartner is more attractive than Leidos Holdings.

Gartner has a beta of 1.192, which suggesting that the stock is 19.152% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leidos Holdings has a beta of 0.645, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.497%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leidos Holdings offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings pays out 16.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Leidos Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Leidos Holdings quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Gartner's net income of $210.9M is lower than Leidos Holdings's net income of $363M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.62x while Leidos Holdings's PE ratio is 16.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 4.48x versus 1.28x for Leidos Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veea has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Gartner's net margin of -65748.98%. Gartner's return on equity of 118.61% beat Veea's return on equity of --.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $480.82, signalling upside risk potential of 32.25%. On the other hand Veea has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gartner has higher upside potential than Veea, analysts believe Gartner is more attractive than Veea.

Gartner has a beta of 1.192, which suggesting that the stock is 19.152% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veea has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veea offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veea pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Veea quarterly revenues of $14.3K. Gartner's net income of $210.9M is higher than Veea's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.62x while Veea's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 4.48x versus 356.66x for Veea. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verra Mobility has a net margin of 13.75% compared to Gartner's net margin of 14.49%. Gartner's return on equity of 118.61% beat Verra Mobility's return on equity of 8.93%.

Gartner has a consensus price target of $480.82, signalling upside risk potential of 32.25%. On the other hand Verra Mobility has an analysts' consensus of $28.92 which suggests that it could grow by 15.85%. Given that Gartner has higher upside potential than Verra Mobility, analysts believe Gartner is more attractive than Verra Mobility.

Gartner has a beta of 1.192, which suggesting that the stock is 19.152% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verra Mobility has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.644%.

Gartner has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verra Mobility offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gartner pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verra Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gartner quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Verra Mobility quarterly revenues of $223.3M. Gartner's net income of $210.9M is higher than Verra Mobility's net income of $32.3M. Notably, Gartner's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.62x while Verra Mobility's PE ratio is 124.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gartner is 4.48x versus 4.64x for Verra Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.