HY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Superconductor has a net margin of 0.95% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 1.81%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 20.01% beat American Superconductor's return on equity of 3.49%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 38.34%. On the other hand American Superconductor has an analysts' consensus of $39.00 which suggests that it could fall by -5.04%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than American Superconductor, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than American Superconductor.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.489, which suggesting that the stock is 48.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Superconductor has a beta of 2.912, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 191.21%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.48%. American Superconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hyster Yale pays 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. American Superconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyster Yale's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $910.4M, which are larger than American Superconductor quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Hyster Yale's net income of $8.6M is higher than American Superconductor's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while American Superconductor's PE ratio is 273.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.17x versus 6.92x for American Superconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of 0.95% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 11.8%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 20.01% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 34.79%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 38.34%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $213.72 which suggests that it could fall by -2.33%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.489, which suggesting that the stock is 48.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.199, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.92%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.48%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Hyster Yale pays 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $910.4M, which are smaller than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. Hyster Yale's net income of $8.6M is lower than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $118.5M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 26.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.17x versus 3.09x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordson has a net margin of 0.95% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 16.46%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 20.01% beat Nordson's return on equity of 15.49%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 38.34%. On the other hand Nordson has an analysts' consensus of $250.39 which suggests that it could grow by 17.55%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Nordson, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Nordson.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.489, which suggesting that the stock is 48.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson has a beta of 0.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.439%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.48%. Nordson offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Hyster Yale pays 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $910.4M, which are larger than Nordson quarterly revenues of $682.9M. Hyster Yale's net income of $8.6M is lower than Nordson's net income of $112.4M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while Nordson's PE ratio is 27.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.17x versus 4.52x for Nordson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Terex has a net margin of 0.95% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 1.71%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 20.01% beat Terex's return on equity of 13.48%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of $56.00, signalling upside risk potential of 38.34%. On the other hand Terex has an analysts' consensus of $51.59 which suggests that it could grow by 3.85%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Terex, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Terex.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.489, which suggesting that the stock is 48.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Terex has a beta of 1.585, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.48%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.48%. Terex offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Hyster Yale pays 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Terex pays out 13.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $910.4M, which are smaller than Terex quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Hyster Yale's net income of $8.6M is lower than Terex's net income of $21M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while Terex's PE ratio is 13.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.17x versus 0.66x for Terex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.