HUBS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DoubleVerify Holdings has a net margin of -3.05% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 1.43%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33% beat DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 4.72%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $745.38, signalling upside risk potential of 37.64%. On the other hand DoubleVerify Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $18.42 which suggests that it could grow by 19.31%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.656, which suggesting that the stock is 65.598% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DoubleVerify Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DoubleVerify Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $714.1M, which are larger than DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues of $165.1M. HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M is lower than DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $2.4M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,700.56x while DoubleVerify Holdings's PE ratio is 55.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 10.39x versus 3.92x for DoubleVerify Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UiPath has a net margin of -3.05% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -6.33%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33% beat UiPath's return on equity of -3.7%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $745.38, signalling upside risk potential of 37.64%. On the other hand UiPath has an analysts' consensus of $14.39 which suggests that it could grow by 16.01%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than UiPath, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than UiPath.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.656, which suggesting that the stock is 65.598% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UiPath offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $714.1M, which are larger than UiPath quarterly revenues of $356.6M. HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M is higher than UiPath's net income of -$22.6M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,700.56x while UiPath's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 10.39x versus 4.74x for UiPath. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twilio has a net margin of -3.05% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 1.71%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33% beat Twilio's return on equity of -0.4%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $745.38, signalling upside risk potential of 37.64%. On the other hand Twilio has an analysts' consensus of $130.71 which suggests that it could grow by 7%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than Twilio, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than Twilio.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.656, which suggesting that the stock is 65.598% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twilio has a beta of 1.302, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.173%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twilio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twilio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $714.1M, which are smaller than Twilio quarterly revenues of $1.2B. HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M is lower than Twilio's net income of $20M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,700.56x while Twilio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 10.39x versus 4.30x for Twilio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of -3.05% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -8.17%. HubSpot's return on equity of -1.33% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $745.38, signalling upside risk potential of 37.64%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $25.33 which suggests that it could grow by 69.23%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.656, which suggesting that the stock is 65.598% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $714.1M, which are larger than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $264.4M. HubSpot's net income of -$21.8M is lower than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,700.56x while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 10.39x versus 2.73x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.