GPRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 10.65% compared to GeoPark's net margin of 17.25%. GeoPark's return on equity of 51% beat ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.1%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of $11.40, signalling upside risk potential of 69.64%. On the other hand ConocoPhillips has an analysts' consensus of $117.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.86%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than ConocoPhillips, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than ConocoPhillips.

GeoPark has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.435% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.616, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.357%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.75%. ConocoPhillips offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. GeoPark pays 31.16% of its earnings as a dividend. ConocoPhillips pays out 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $143.7M, which are smaller than ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues of $16.5B. GeoPark's net income of $15.3M is lower than ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.8B. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.93x while ConocoPhillips's PE ratio is 11.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.53x versus 1.92x for ConocoPhillips. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chevron has a net margin of 10.65% compared to GeoPark's net margin of 7.59%. GeoPark's return on equity of 51% beat Chevron's return on equity of 10.01%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of $11.40, signalling upside risk potential of 69.64%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $164.40 which suggests that it could grow by 9.66%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Chevron, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Chevron.

GeoPark has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.435% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 0.830, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.023%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.75%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. GeoPark pays 31.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 66.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $143.7M, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $46.1B. GeoPark's net income of $15.3M is lower than Chevron's net income of $3.5B. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.93x while Chevron's PE ratio is 17.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.53x versus 1.39x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ecopetrol SA has a net margin of 10.65% compared to GeoPark's net margin of 9.97%. GeoPark's return on equity of 51% beat Ecopetrol SA's return on equity of 19.25%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of $11.40, signalling upside risk potential of 69.64%. On the other hand Ecopetrol SA has an analysts' consensus of $9.41 which suggests that it could grow by 6.08%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Ecopetrol SA, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Ecopetrol SA.

GeoPark has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.435% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ecopetrol SA has a beta of 0.854, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.573%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.75%. Ecopetrol SA offers a yield of 17.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. GeoPark pays 31.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Ecopetrol SA pays out 112.46% of its earnings as a dividend. GeoPark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Ecopetrol SA's is not.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $143.7M, which are smaller than Ecopetrol SA quarterly revenues of $7.5B. GeoPark's net income of $15.3M is lower than Ecopetrol SA's net income of $749M. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.93x while Ecopetrol SA's PE ratio is 5.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.53x versus 0.56x for Ecopetrol SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expand Energy has a net margin of 10.65% compared to GeoPark's net margin of -11.34%. GeoPark's return on equity of 51% beat Expand Energy's return on equity of -7.49%.

GeoPark has a consensus price target of $11.40, signalling upside risk potential of 69.64%. On the other hand Expand Energy has an analysts' consensus of $131.85 which suggests that it could grow by 21.73%. Given that GeoPark has higher upside potential than Expand Energy, analysts believe GeoPark is more attractive than Expand Energy.

GeoPark has a beta of 0.756, which suggesting that the stock is 24.435% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expand Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GeoPark has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.75%. Expand Energy offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. GeoPark pays 31.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Expand Energy pays out -54.34% of its earnings as a dividend. GeoPark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GeoPark quarterly revenues are $143.7M, which are smaller than Expand Energy quarterly revenues of $2.2B. GeoPark's net income of $15.3M is higher than Expand Energy's net income of -$249M. Notably, GeoPark's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.93x while Expand Energy's PE ratio is 63.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GeoPark is 0.53x versus 3.71x for Expand Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.