GFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Janus International Group has a net margin of 9.28% compared to Griffon's net margin of 5.13%. Griffon's return on equity of 105.75% beat Janus International Group's return on equity of 9.48%.

Griffon has a consensus price target of $96.71, signalling upside risk potential of 26.44%. On the other hand Janus International Group has an analysts' consensus of $9.70 which suggests that it could grow by 13.32%. Given that Griffon has higher upside potential than Janus International Group, analysts believe Griffon is more attractive than Janus International Group.

Griffon has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Janus International Group has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.892%.

Griffon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Janus International Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Griffon pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Janus International Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Griffon quarterly revenues are $611.7M, which are larger than Janus International Group quarterly revenues of $210.5M. Griffon's net income of $56.8M is higher than Janus International Group's net income of $10.8M. Notably, Griffon's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.84x while Janus International Group's PE ratio is 24.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Griffon is 1.44x versus 1.36x for Janus International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanex Building Products has a net margin of 9.28% compared to Griffon's net margin of 4.53%. Griffon's return on equity of 105.75% beat Quanex Building Products's return on equity of 2.06%.

Griffon has a consensus price target of $96.71, signalling upside risk potential of 26.44%. On the other hand Quanex Building Products has an analysts' consensus of $33.75 which suggests that it could grow by 82.33%. Given that Quanex Building Products has higher upside potential than Griffon, analysts believe Quanex Building Products is more attractive than Griffon.

Griffon has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanex Building Products has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.078%.

Griffon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Quanex Building Products offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Griffon pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products pays out 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Griffon quarterly revenues are $611.7M, which are larger than Quanex Building Products quarterly revenues of $452.5M. Griffon's net income of $56.8M is higher than Quanex Building Products's net income of $20.5M. Notably, Griffon's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.84x while Quanex Building Products's PE ratio is 31.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Griffon is 1.44x versus 0.50x for Quanex Building Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Holdings has a net margin of 9.28% compared to Griffon's net margin of -484.97%. Griffon's return on equity of 105.75% beat Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67%.

Griffon has a consensus price target of $96.71, signalling upside risk potential of 26.44%. On the other hand Safe & Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29196.88%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Griffon, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Griffon.

Griffon has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of 1.804, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.41%.

Griffon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Safe & Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Griffon pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Griffon quarterly revenues are $611.7M, which are larger than Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $566.4K. Griffon's net income of $56.8M is higher than Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Griffon's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.84x while Safe & Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Griffon is 1.44x versus 0.52x for Safe & Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Techprecision has a net margin of 9.28% compared to Griffon's net margin of -18.28%. Griffon's return on equity of 105.75% beat Techprecision's return on equity of -71.07%.

Griffon has a consensus price target of $96.71, signalling upside risk potential of 26.44%. On the other hand Techprecision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Griffon has higher upside potential than Techprecision, analysts believe Griffon is more attractive than Techprecision.

Griffon has a beta of 1.143, which suggesting that the stock is 14.31% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Techprecision has a beta of 0.222, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.767%.

Griffon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Techprecision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Griffon pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Techprecision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Griffon quarterly revenues are $611.7M, which are larger than Techprecision quarterly revenues of $8M. Griffon's net income of $56.8M is higher than Techprecision's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Griffon's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.84x while Techprecision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Griffon is 1.44x versus 0.96x for Techprecision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.