FUL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 4.66% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of 4.12%. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 5.65% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 0.89%.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $66.20, signalling upside risk potential of 8.19%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $55.23 which suggests that it could grow by 5.19%. Given that H.B. Fuller has higher upside potential than Commercial Metals, analysts believe H.B. Fuller is more attractive than Commercial Metals.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.121, which suggesting that the stock is 12.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.213%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.48%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $898.1M, which are smaller than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $2B. H.B. Fuller's net income of $41.8M is lower than Commercial Metals's net income of $83.1M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.08x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 169.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.97x versus 0.78x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 4.66% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of --. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 5.65% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $66.20, signalling upside risk potential of 8.19%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 143.62%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than H.B. Fuller.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.121, which suggesting that the stock is 12.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.451%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.48%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $898.1M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. H.B. Fuller's net income of $41.8M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.08x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.97x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worthington Steel has a net margin of 4.66% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of 6.69%. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 5.65% beat Worthington Steel's return on equity of 9.63%.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $66.20, signalling upside risk potential of 8.19%. On the other hand Worthington Steel has an analysts' consensus of $34.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.43%. Given that H.B. Fuller has higher upside potential than Worthington Steel, analysts believe H.B. Fuller is more attractive than Worthington Steel.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.121, which suggesting that the stock is 12.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worthington Steel has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.48%. Worthington Steel offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel pays out 28.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $898.1M, which are larger than Worthington Steel quarterly revenues of $832.9M. H.B. Fuller's net income of $41.8M is lower than Worthington Steel's net income of $55.7M. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.08x while Worthington Steel's PE ratio is 14.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.97x versus 0.53x for Worthington Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 4.66% compared to H.B. Fuller's net margin of --. H.B. Fuller's return on equity of 5.65% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

H.B. Fuller has a consensus price target of $66.20, signalling upside risk potential of 8.19%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 140.39%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than H.B. Fuller, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than H.B. Fuller.

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.121, which suggesting that the stock is 12.088% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.534%.

H.B. Fuller has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.48%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. H.B. Fuller pays 36.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. H.B. Fuller's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

H.B. Fuller quarterly revenues are $898.1M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. H.B. Fuller's net income of $41.8M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, H.B. Fuller's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.08x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for H.B. Fuller is 0.97x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.