FI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intellinetics has a net margin of 16.59% compared to Fiserv's net margin of -17.13%. Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -10.61%.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $217.25, signalling upside risk potential of 31.1%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could grow by 22.68%. Given that Fiserv has higher upside potential than Intellinetics, analysts believe Fiserv is more attractive than Intellinetics.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.737% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.510, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.997%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.2M. Fiserv's net income of $851M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$727.6K. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.28x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 4.60x versus 3.30x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paymentus Holdings has a net margin of 16.59% compared to Fiserv's net margin of 5.02%. Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52% beat Paymentus Holdings's return on equity of 10.82%.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $217.25, signalling upside risk potential of 31.1%. On the other hand Paymentus Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $37.38 which suggests that it could grow by 26.35%. Given that Fiserv has higher upside potential than Paymentus Holdings, analysts believe Fiserv is more attractive than Paymentus Holdings.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.737% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paymentus Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paymentus Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paymentus Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Paymentus Holdings quarterly revenues of $275.2M. Fiserv's net income of $851M is higher than Paymentus Holdings's net income of $13.8M. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.28x while Paymentus Holdings's PE ratio is 75.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 4.60x versus 3.94x for Paymentus Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of 16.59% compared to Fiserv's net margin of -568.22%. Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $217.25, signalling upside risk potential of 31.1%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fiserv has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Fiserv is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.737% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $148.4K. Fiserv's net income of $851M is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$843K. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.28x while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 4.60x versus 3.68x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 16.59% compared to Fiserv's net margin of -2.12%. Fiserv's return on equity of 11.52% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

Fiserv has a consensus price target of $217.25, signalling upside risk potential of 31.1%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 135.85%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Fiserv, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Fiserv.

Fiserv has a beta of 0.913, which suggesting that the stock is 8.737% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.603, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.329%.

Fiserv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiserv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fiserv quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. Fiserv's net income of $851M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, Fiserv's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.28x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiserv is 4.60x versus 0.21x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.