DBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Motorcar Parts of America has a net margin of -2.54% compared to Designer Brands's net margin of -0.37%. Designer Brands's return on equity of -9.02% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity of -7.28%.

Designer Brands has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.68%. On the other hand Motorcar Parts of America has an analysts' consensus of $16.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.13%. Given that Motorcar Parts of America has higher upside potential than Designer Brands, analysts believe Motorcar Parts of America is more attractive than Designer Brands.

Designer Brands has a beta of 1.665, which suggesting that the stock is 66.457% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.355, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.493%.

Designer Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.07%. Motorcar Parts of America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Designer Brands pays -99.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Motorcar Parts of America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Designer Brands quarterly revenues are $686.9M, which are larger than Motorcar Parts of America quarterly revenues of $193.1M. Designer Brands's net income of -$17.4M is lower than Motorcar Parts of America's net income of -$722K. Notably, Designer Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Motorcar Parts of America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands is 0.05x versus 0.30x for Motorcar Parts of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nike has a net margin of -2.54% compared to Designer Brands's net margin of 1.9%. Designer Brands's return on equity of -9.02% beat Nike's return on equity of 23.12%.

Designer Brands has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.68%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $76.25 which suggests that it could grow by 4.47%. Given that Designer Brands has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Designer Brands is more attractive than Nike.

Designer Brands has a beta of 1.665, which suggesting that the stock is 66.457% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.250, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.963%.

Designer Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.07%. Nike offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Designer Brands pays -99.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Designer Brands quarterly revenues are $686.9M, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Designer Brands's net income of -$17.4M is lower than Nike's net income of $211M. Notably, Designer Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Nike's PE ratio is 33.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands is 0.05x versus 2.34x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocky Brands has a net margin of -2.54% compared to Designer Brands's net margin of 4.33%. Designer Brands's return on equity of -9.02% beat Rocky Brands's return on equity of 6.01%.

Designer Brands has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.68%. On the other hand Rocky Brands has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could fall by -14.86%. Given that Designer Brands has higher upside potential than Rocky Brands, analysts believe Designer Brands is more attractive than Rocky Brands.

Designer Brands has a beta of 1.665, which suggesting that the stock is 66.457% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocky Brands has a beta of 2.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 133.586%.

Designer Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.07%. Rocky Brands offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Designer Brands pays -99.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocky Brands pays out 40.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocky Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Designer Brands quarterly revenues are $686.9M, which are larger than Rocky Brands quarterly revenues of $114.1M. Designer Brands's net income of -$17.4M is lower than Rocky Brands's net income of $4.9M. Notably, Designer Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Rocky Brands's PE ratio is 12.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands is 0.05x versus 0.39x for Rocky Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shoe Carnival has a net margin of -2.54% compared to Designer Brands's net margin of 3.36%. Designer Brands's return on equity of -9.02% beat Shoe Carnival's return on equity of 10.43%.

Designer Brands has a consensus price target of $3.50, signalling upside risk potential of 23.68%. On the other hand Shoe Carnival has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.28%. Given that Designer Brands has higher upside potential than Shoe Carnival, analysts believe Designer Brands is more attractive than Shoe Carnival.

Designer Brands has a beta of 1.665, which suggesting that the stock is 66.457% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shoe Carnival has a beta of 1.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.559%.

Designer Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.07%. Shoe Carnival offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Designer Brands pays -99.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Shoe Carnival pays out 19.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Shoe Carnival's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Designer Brands quarterly revenues are $686.9M, which are larger than Shoe Carnival quarterly revenues of $277.7M. Designer Brands's net income of -$17.4M is lower than Shoe Carnival's net income of $9.3M. Notably, Designer Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.22x while Shoe Carnival's PE ratio is 8.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Designer Brands is 0.05x versus 0.48x for Shoe Carnival. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.