CARS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Digital Ally has a net margin of -1.12% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 95.27%. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14% beat Digital Ally's return on equity of -544.19%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $16.21, signalling upside risk potential of 31.5%. On the other hand Digital Ally has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1037635.85%. Given that Digital Ally has higher upside potential than Cars.com, analysts believe Digital Ally is more attractive than Cars.com.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.857, which suggesting that the stock is 85.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digital Ally has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.487%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Digital Ally offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Digital Ally pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179M, which are larger than Digital Ally quarterly revenues of $4.5M. Cars.com's net income of -$2M is lower than Digital Ally's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while Digital Ally's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 1.15x versus 0.00x for Digital Ally. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Match Group has a net margin of -1.12% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 14.15%. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14% beat Match Group's return on equity of --.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $16.21, signalling upside risk potential of 31.5%. On the other hand Match Group has an analysts' consensus of $34.06 which suggests that it could grow by 5.7%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than Match Group, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than Match Group.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.857, which suggesting that the stock is 85.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Match Group has a beta of 1.328, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.804%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Match Group offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Match Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179M, which are smaller than Match Group quarterly revenues of $831.2M. Cars.com's net income of -$2M is lower than Match Group's net income of $117.6M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while Match Group's PE ratio is 15.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 1.15x versus 2.53x for Match Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Travelzoo has a net margin of -1.12% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 13.69%. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14% beat Travelzoo's return on equity of 309.82%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $16.21, signalling upside risk potential of 31.5%. On the other hand Travelzoo has an analysts' consensus of $26.25 which suggests that it could grow by 102.86%. Given that Travelzoo has higher upside potential than Cars.com, analysts believe Travelzoo is more attractive than Cars.com.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.857, which suggesting that the stock is 85.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Travelzoo has a beta of 1.133, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.257%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Travelzoo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Travelzoo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179M, which are larger than Travelzoo quarterly revenues of $23.1M. Cars.com's net income of -$2M is lower than Travelzoo's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while Travelzoo's PE ratio is 12.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 1.15x versus 1.90x for Travelzoo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zillow Group has a net margin of -1.12% compared to Cars.com's net margin of 1.34%. Cars.com's return on equity of 9.14% beat Zillow Group's return on equity of -1.73%.

Cars.com has a consensus price target of $16.21, signalling upside risk potential of 31.5%. On the other hand Zillow Group has an analysts' consensus of $79.89 which suggests that it could grow by 7.73%. Given that Cars.com has higher upside potential than Zillow Group, analysts believe Cars.com is more attractive than Zillow Group.

Cars.com has a beta of 1.857, which suggesting that the stock is 85.73% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zillow Group has a beta of 2.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.269%.

Cars.com has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zillow Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cars.com pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zillow Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cars.com quarterly revenues are $179M, which are smaller than Zillow Group quarterly revenues of $598M. Cars.com's net income of -$2M is lower than Zillow Group's net income of $8M. Notably, Cars.com's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while Zillow Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cars.com is 1.15x versus 7.70x for Zillow Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.