CANG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boqii Holding has a net margin of -19.68% compared to Cango's net margin of --. Cango's return on equity of 0.13% beat Boqii Holding's return on equity of -25.13%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -43%. On the other hand Boqii Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21744.73%. Given that Boqii Holding has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Boqii Holding is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.239% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boqii Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Boqii Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Boqii Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $144.9M, which are larger than Boqii Holding quarterly revenues of --. Cango's net income of -$28.5M is higher than Boqii Holding's net income of --. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while Boqii Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 2.46x versus 0.01x for Boqii Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

China Telecom has a net margin of -19.68% compared to Cango's net margin of --. Cango's return on equity of 0.13% beat China Telecom's return on equity of --.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -43%. On the other hand China Telecom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cango has higher upside potential than China Telecom, analysts believe Cango is more attractive than China Telecom.

Cango has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.239% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Telecom has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Telecom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Telecom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $144.9M, which are larger than China Telecom quarterly revenues of --. Cango's net income of -$28.5M is higher than China Telecom's net income of --. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while China Telecom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 2.46x versus -- for China Telecom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tuniu has a net margin of -19.68% compared to Cango's net margin of -4%. Cango's return on equity of 0.13% beat Tuniu's return on equity of 5.79%.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -43%. On the other hand Tuniu has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 96.66%. Given that Tuniu has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Tuniu is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.239% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tuniu has a beta of 1.574, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.414%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tuniu offers a yield of 4.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tuniu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $144.9M, which are larger than Tuniu quarterly revenues of $16.2M. Cango's net income of -$28.5M is lower than Tuniu's net income of -$645.8K. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while Tuniu's PE ratio is 12.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 2.46x versus 1.42x for Tuniu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uxin has a net margin of -19.68% compared to Cango's net margin of -10.53%. Cango's return on equity of 0.13% beat Uxin's return on equity of --.

Cango has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -43%. On the other hand Uxin has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 852.36%. Given that Uxin has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Uxin is more attractive than Cango.

Cango has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.239% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uxin has a beta of 1.259, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.943%.

Cango has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uxin offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cango pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uxin pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cango quarterly revenues are $144.9M, which are larger than Uxin quarterly revenues of $69.3M. Cango's net income of -$28.5M is lower than Uxin's net income of -$7.3M. Notably, Cango's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.70x while Uxin's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cango is 2.46x versus 3.74x for Uxin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.