BOOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Five Below has a net margin of 8.27% compared to Boot Barn Holdings's net margin of 4.24%. Boot Barn Holdings's return on equity of 17.52% beat Five Below's return on equity of 15.53%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a consensus price target of $183.71, signalling upside risk potential of 9.88%. On the other hand Five Below has an analysts' consensus of $131.27 which suggests that it could fall by -3.79%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings has higher upside potential than Five Below, analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings is more attractive than Five Below.

Boot Barn Holdings has a beta of 1.686, which suggesting that the stock is 68.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five Below has a beta of 1.044, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.4%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five Below offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Boot Barn Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five Below pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boot Barn Holdings quarterly revenues are $453.7M, which are smaller than Five Below quarterly revenues of $970.5M. Boot Barn Holdings's net income of $37.5M is lower than Five Below's net income of $41.1M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.53x while Five Below's PE ratio is 28.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings is 2.69x versus 1.86x for Five Below. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Foot Locker has a net margin of 8.27% compared to Boot Barn Holdings's net margin of -20.23%. Boot Barn Holdings's return on equity of 17.52% beat Foot Locker's return on equity of -12.67%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a consensus price target of $183.71, signalling upside risk potential of 9.88%. On the other hand Foot Locker has an analysts' consensus of $23.09 which suggests that it could fall by -6.85%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings has higher upside potential than Foot Locker, analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings is more attractive than Foot Locker.

Boot Barn Holdings has a beta of 1.686, which suggesting that the stock is 68.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foot Locker has a beta of 1.727, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.699%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foot Locker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Boot Barn Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foot Locker pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Boot Barn Holdings quarterly revenues are $453.7M, which are smaller than Foot Locker quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Boot Barn Holdings's net income of $37.5M is higher than Foot Locker's net income of -$363M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.53x while Foot Locker's PE ratio is 184.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings is 2.69x versus 0.30x for Foot Locker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shoe Carnival has a net margin of 8.27% compared to Boot Barn Holdings's net margin of 3.36%. Boot Barn Holdings's return on equity of 17.52% beat Shoe Carnival's return on equity of 10.43%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a consensus price target of $183.71, signalling upside risk potential of 9.88%. On the other hand Shoe Carnival has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 9.86%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings has higher upside potential than Shoe Carnival, analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings is more attractive than Shoe Carnival.

Boot Barn Holdings has a beta of 1.686, which suggesting that the stock is 68.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shoe Carnival has a beta of 1.376, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.559%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shoe Carnival offers a yield of 2.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Boot Barn Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shoe Carnival pays out 19.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Shoe Carnival's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boot Barn Holdings quarterly revenues are $453.7M, which are larger than Shoe Carnival quarterly revenues of $277.7M. Boot Barn Holdings's net income of $37.5M is higher than Shoe Carnival's net income of $9.3M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.53x while Shoe Carnival's PE ratio is 8.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings is 2.69x versus 0.48x for Shoe Carnival. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply has a net margin of 8.27% compared to Boot Barn Holdings's net margin of 5.17%. Boot Barn Holdings's return on equity of 17.52% beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 48.21%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a consensus price target of $183.71, signalling upside risk potential of 9.88%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $55.05 which suggests that it could fall by -1.76%. Given that Boot Barn Holdings has higher upside potential than Tractor Supply, analysts believe Boot Barn Holdings is more attractive than Tractor Supply.

Boot Barn Holdings has a beta of 1.686, which suggesting that the stock is 68.609% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.604%.

Boot Barn Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Boot Barn Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 42.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Boot Barn Holdings quarterly revenues are $453.7M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Boot Barn Holdings's net income of $37.5M is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $179.4M. Notably, Boot Barn Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.53x while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 27.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Boot Barn Holdings is 2.69x versus 2.01x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.