BKH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chesapeake Utilities has a net margin of 16.68% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 17.04%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat Chesapeake Utilities's return on equity of 9.13%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.50, signalling upside risk potential of 14.99%. On the other hand Chesapeake Utilities has an analysts' consensus of $136.67 which suggests that it could grow by 11.47%. Given that Black Hills has higher upside potential than Chesapeake Utilities, analysts believe Black Hills is more attractive than Chesapeake Utilities.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chesapeake Utilities has a beta of 0.653, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.653%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.66%. Chesapeake Utilities offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Chesapeake Utilities pays out 45.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $805.2M, which are larger than Chesapeake Utilities quarterly revenues of $298.7M. Black Hills's net income of $134.3M is higher than Chesapeake Utilities's net income of $50.9M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Chesapeake Utilities's PE ratio is 22.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.83x versus 3.31x for Chesapeake Utilities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OPAL Fuels has a net margin of 16.68% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 2.79%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.41%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.50, signalling upside risk potential of 14.99%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $4.75 which suggests that it could grow by 95.47%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than Black Hills.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.66%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but OPAL Fuels's is not.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $805.2M, which are larger than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $85.4M. Black Hills's net income of $134.3M is higher than OPAL Fuels's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 121.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.83x versus 0.21x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RGC Resources has a net margin of 16.68% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 21.05%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.89%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.50, signalling upside risk potential of 14.99%. On the other hand RGC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.85%. Given that RGC Resources has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe RGC Resources is more attractive than Black Hills.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RGC Resources has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.721%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.66%. RGC Resources offers a yield of 3.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $805.2M, which are larger than RGC Resources quarterly revenues of $36.5M. Black Hills's net income of $134.3M is higher than RGC Resources's net income of $7.7M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while RGC Resources's PE ratio is 17.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.83x versus 2.45x for RGC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sempra has a net margin of 16.68% compared to Black Hills's net margin of 24.12%. Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.15%.

Black Hills has a consensus price target of $65.50, signalling upside risk potential of 14.99%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $80.93 which suggests that it could grow by 7.56%. Given that Black Hills has higher upside potential than Sempra, analysts believe Black Hills is more attractive than Sempra.

Black Hills has a beta of 0.699, which suggesting that the stock is 30.068% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.631, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.92%.

Black Hills has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.66%. Sempra offers a yield of 3.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Black Hills pays 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 53.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Black Hills quarterly revenues are $805.2M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Black Hills's net income of $134.3M is lower than Sempra's net income of $917M. Notably, Black Hills's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.53x while Sempra's PE ratio is 16.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Black Hills is 1.83x versus 3.62x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.