BALL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Graphic Packaging Holding has a net margin of 5.78% compared to Ball's net margin of 5.99%. Ball's return on equity of 7.7% beat Graphic Packaging Holding's return on equity of 20.87%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $63.27, signalling upside risk potential of 8.55%. On the other hand Graphic Packaging Holding has an analysts' consensus of $25.52 which suggests that it could grow by 15.93%. Given that Graphic Packaging Holding has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe Graphic Packaging Holding is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graphic Packaging Holding has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.53%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Graphic Packaging Holding offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Graphic Packaging Holding pays out 18.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Graphic Packaging Holding quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Ball's net income of $179M is higher than Graphic Packaging Holding's net income of $127M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.70x while Graphic Packaging Holding's PE ratio is 10.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.46x versus 0.77x for Graphic Packaging Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of 5.78% compared to Ball's net margin of -4.88%. Ball's return on equity of 7.7% beat Mattel's return on equity of 24.74%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $63.27, signalling upside risk potential of 8.55%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $24.18 which suggests that it could grow by 23.36%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.704%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ball's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Mattel quarterly revenues of $826.6M. Ball's net income of $179M is higher than Mattel's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.70x while Mattel's PE ratio is 12.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.46x versus 1.23x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 5.78% compared to Ball's net margin of -43.95%. Ball's return on equity of 7.7% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -57.26%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $63.27, signalling upside risk potential of 8.55%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.83 which suggests that it could grow by 19.7%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ball's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Ball's net income of $179M is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$545M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.70x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.46x versus 2.61x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silgan Holdings has a net margin of 5.78% compared to Ball's net margin of 4.63%. Ball's return on equity of 7.7% beat Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 14.52%.

Ball has a consensus price target of $63.27, signalling upside risk potential of 8.55%. On the other hand Silgan Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $61.07 which suggests that it could grow by 11.5%. Given that Silgan Holdings has higher upside potential than Ball, analysts believe Silgan Holdings is more attractive than Ball.

Ball has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.449% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.749, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.128%.

Ball has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. Silgan Holdings offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Ball pays 6.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Silgan Holdings pays out 29.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ball quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Ball's net income of $179M is higher than Silgan Holdings's net income of $68M. Notably, Ball's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.70x while Silgan Holdings's PE ratio is 20.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ball is 1.46x versus 0.98x for Silgan Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.