ACM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Exponent has a net margin of 3.8% compared to AECOM's net margin of 18.32%. AECOM's return on equity of 25.45% beat Exponent's return on equity of 25.86%.

AECOM has a consensus price target of $121.42, signalling upside risk potential of 7.28%. On the other hand Exponent has an analysts' consensus of $92.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.17%. Given that Exponent has higher upside potential than AECOM, analysts believe Exponent is more attractive than AECOM.

AECOM has a beta of 0.964, which suggesting that the stock is 3.645% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exponent has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.051%.

AECOM has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Exponent offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. AECOM pays 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Exponent pays out 53.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AECOM quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Exponent quarterly revenues of $145.5M. AECOM's net income of $143.4M is higher than Exponent's net income of $26.7M. Notably, AECOM's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.66x while Exponent's PE ratio is 35.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AECOM is 0.95x versus 6.73x for Exponent. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jacobs Solutions has a net margin of 3.8% compared to AECOM's net margin of 0.19%. AECOM's return on equity of 25.45% beat Jacobs Solutions's return on equity of 7.69%.

AECOM has a consensus price target of $121.42, signalling upside risk potential of 7.28%. On the other hand Jacobs Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $144.16 which suggests that it could grow by 4.67%. Given that AECOM has higher upside potential than Jacobs Solutions, analysts believe AECOM is more attractive than Jacobs Solutions.

AECOM has a beta of 0.964, which suggesting that the stock is 3.645% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jacobs Solutions has a beta of 0.773, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.709%.

AECOM has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Jacobs Solutions offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. AECOM pays 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Jacobs Solutions pays out 17.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AECOM quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Jacobs Solutions quarterly revenues of $2.9B. AECOM's net income of $143.4M is higher than Jacobs Solutions's net income of $5.6M. Notably, AECOM's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.66x while Jacobs Solutions's PE ratio is 37.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AECOM is 0.95x versus 1.92x for Jacobs Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KBR has a net margin of 3.8% compared to AECOM's net margin of 5.65%. AECOM's return on equity of 25.45% beat KBR's return on equity of 27.48%.

AECOM has a consensus price target of $121.42, signalling upside risk potential of 7.28%. On the other hand KBR has an analysts' consensus of $64.63 which suggests that it could grow by 38.18%. Given that KBR has higher upside potential than AECOM, analysts believe KBR is more attractive than AECOM.

AECOM has a beta of 0.964, which suggesting that the stock is 3.645% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KBR has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.735%.

AECOM has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. KBR offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. AECOM pays 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. KBR pays out 21.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AECOM quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than KBR quarterly revenues of $2.1B. AECOM's net income of $143.4M is higher than KBR's net income of $116M. Notably, AECOM's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.66x while KBR's PE ratio is 15.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AECOM is 0.95x versus 0.78x for KBR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tetra Tech has a net margin of 3.8% compared to AECOM's net margin of 0.41%. AECOM's return on equity of 25.45% beat Tetra Tech's return on equity of 11.27%.

AECOM has a consensus price target of $121.42, signalling upside risk potential of 7.28%. On the other hand Tetra Tech has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.09%. Given that Tetra Tech has higher upside potential than AECOM, analysts believe Tetra Tech is more attractive than AECOM.

AECOM has a beta of 0.964, which suggesting that the stock is 3.645% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tetra Tech has a beta of 0.941, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.925%.

AECOM has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.88%. Tetra Tech offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. AECOM pays 28.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Tetra Tech pays out 17.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AECOM quarterly revenues are $3.8B, which are larger than Tetra Tech quarterly revenues of $1.3B. AECOM's net income of $143.4M is higher than Tetra Tech's net income of $5.4M. Notably, AECOM's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.66x while Tetra Tech's PE ratio is 53.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AECOM is 0.95x versus 1.84x for Tetra Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.