ACEL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DraftKings has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Accel Entertainment's net margin of -2.4%. Accel Entertainment's return on equity of 18.62% beat DraftKings's return on equity of -39.16%.

Accel Entertainment has a consensus price target of $15.67, signalling upside risk potential of 30.12%. On the other hand DraftKings has an analysts' consensus of $52.63 which suggests that it could grow by 21.38%. Given that Accel Entertainment has higher upside potential than DraftKings, analysts believe Accel Entertainment is more attractive than DraftKings.

Accel Entertainment has a beta of 1.233, which suggesting that the stock is 23.292% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings has a beta of 1.670, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.969%.

Accel Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DraftKings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Accel Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Accel Entertainment quarterly revenues are $323.9M, which are smaller than DraftKings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Accel Entertainment's net income of $14.6M is higher than DraftKings's net income of -$33.9M. Notably, Accel Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.60x while DraftKings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Accel Entertainment is 0.82x versus 4.30x for DraftKings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspired Entertainment has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Accel Entertainment's net margin of -0.17%. Accel Entertainment's return on equity of 18.62% beat Inspired Entertainment's return on equity of --.

Accel Entertainment has a consensus price target of $15.67, signalling upside risk potential of 30.12%. On the other hand Inspired Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $13.33 which suggests that it could grow by 44.14%. Given that Inspired Entertainment has higher upside potential than Accel Entertainment, analysts believe Inspired Entertainment is more attractive than Accel Entertainment.

Accel Entertainment has a beta of 1.233, which suggesting that the stock is 23.292% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspired Entertainment has a beta of 1.634, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.401%.

Accel Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspired Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Accel Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspired Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Accel Entertainment quarterly revenues are $323.9M, which are larger than Inspired Entertainment quarterly revenues of $60.4M. Accel Entertainment's net income of $14.6M is higher than Inspired Entertainment's net income of -$100K. Notably, Accel Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.60x while Inspired Entertainment's PE ratio is 3.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Accel Entertainment is 0.82x versus 0.93x for Inspired Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Light & Wonder has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Accel Entertainment's net margin of 10.59%. Accel Entertainment's return on equity of 18.62% beat Light & Wonder's return on equity of 44.98%.

Accel Entertainment has a consensus price target of $15.67, signalling upside risk potential of 30.12%. On the other hand Light & Wonder has an analysts' consensus of $112.64 which suggests that it could grow by 14.95%. Given that Accel Entertainment has higher upside potential than Light & Wonder, analysts believe Accel Entertainment is more attractive than Light & Wonder.

Accel Entertainment has a beta of 1.233, which suggesting that the stock is 23.292% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Light & Wonder has a beta of 1.231, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.09%.

Accel Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Light & Wonder offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Accel Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Light & Wonder pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Accel Entertainment quarterly revenues are $323.9M, which are smaller than Light & Wonder quarterly revenues of $774M. Accel Entertainment's net income of $14.6M is lower than Light & Wonder's net income of $82M. Notably, Accel Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.60x while Light & Wonder's PE ratio is 26.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Accel Entertainment is 0.82x versus 2.74x for Light & Wonder. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

High Roller Technologies has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Accel Entertainment's net margin of -48.38%. Accel Entertainment's return on equity of 18.62% beat High Roller Technologies's return on equity of -451.9%.

Accel Entertainment has a consensus price target of $15.67, signalling upside risk potential of 30.12%. On the other hand High Roller Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 183.69%. Given that High Roller Technologies has higher upside potential than Accel Entertainment, analysts believe High Roller Technologies is more attractive than Accel Entertainment.

Accel Entertainment has a beta of 1.233, which suggesting that the stock is 23.292% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison High Roller Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Accel Entertainment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. High Roller Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Accel Entertainment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. High Roller Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Accel Entertainment quarterly revenues are $323.9M, which are larger than High Roller Technologies quarterly revenues of $6.8M. Accel Entertainment's net income of $14.6M is higher than High Roller Technologies's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Accel Entertainment's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.60x while High Roller Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Accel Entertainment is 0.82x versus 0.83x for High Roller Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.