ESP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hubbell has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net margin of 12.43%. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's return on equity of 16.58% beat Hubbell's return on equity of 25.32%.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -51.35%. On the other hand Hubbell has an analysts' consensus of $427.54 which suggests that it could grow by 2.18%. Given that Hubbell has higher upside potential than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics, analysts believe Hubbell is more attractive than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a beta of 0.134, which suggesting that the stock is 86.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hubbell has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.129%.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Hubbell offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.32 per share. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics pays 28.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Hubbell pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics quarterly revenues are $10.3M, which are smaller than Hubbell quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net income of $1.7M is lower than Hubbell's net income of $169.7M. Notably, Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.18x while Hubbell's PE ratio is 28.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Espey Manufacturing & Electronics is 2.96x versus 4.04x for Hubbell. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimball Electronics has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net margin of 1.02%. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's return on equity of 16.58% beat Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 3.31%.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -51.35%. On the other hand Kimball Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $19.75 which suggests that it could grow by 1.8%. Given that Kimball Electronics has higher upside potential than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics, analysts believe Kimball Electronics is more attractive than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a beta of 0.134, which suggesting that the stock is 86.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.2%.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Kimball Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics pays 28.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimball Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics quarterly revenues are $10.3M, which are smaller than Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues of $374.6M. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net income of $1.7M is lower than Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.18x while Kimball Electronics's PE ratio is 27.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Espey Manufacturing & Electronics is 2.96x versus 0.32x for Kimball Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Orbit International has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net margin of --. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's return on equity of 16.58% beat Orbit International's return on equity of --.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -51.35%. On the other hand Orbit International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 26.12%. Given that Orbit International has higher upside potential than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics, analysts believe Orbit International is more attractive than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a beta of 0.134, which suggesting that the stock is 86.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Orbit International has a beta of 0.148, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.237%.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Orbit International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics pays 28.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Orbit International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics quarterly revenues are $10.3M, which are larger than Orbit International quarterly revenues of --. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net income of $1.7M is higher than Orbit International's net income of --. Notably, Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.18x while Orbit International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Espey Manufacturing & Electronics is 2.96x versus 0.71x for Orbit International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RF Industries has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net margin of -1.3%. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's return on equity of 16.58% beat RF Industries's return on equity of -4.19%.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -51.35%. On the other hand RF Industries has an analysts' consensus of $6.25 which suggests that it could fall by -9.42%. Given that Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has more downside risk than RF Industries, analysts believe RF Industries is more attractive than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a beta of 0.134, which suggesting that the stock is 86.6% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RF Industries has a beta of 0.778, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.181%.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. RF Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics pays 28.86% of its earnings as a dividend. RF Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Espey Manufacturing & Electronics quarterly revenues are $10.3M, which are smaller than RF Industries quarterly revenues of $18.9M. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net income of $1.7M is higher than RF Industries's net income of -$245K. Notably, Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.18x while RF Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Espey Manufacturing & Electronics is 2.96x versus 0.99x for RF Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.