VALU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 57.58% compared to Value Line's net margin of 3.23%. Value Line's return on equity of 22.91% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 15.99%.

Value Line has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $309.19 which suggests that it could fall by -22.35%. Given that Coinbase Global has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe Coinbase Global is more attractive than Value Line.

Value Line has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.082% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Value Line has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Value Line pays 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Value Line's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2B. Value Line's net income of $5.2M is lower than Coinbase Global's net income of $65.6M. Notably, Value Line's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.05x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 74.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line is 10.26x versus 15.48x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Galaxy Digital has a net margin of 57.58% compared to Value Line's net margin of --. Value Line's return on equity of 22.91% beat Galaxy Digital's return on equity of --.

Value Line has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Galaxy Digital has an analysts' consensus of $28.17 which suggests that it could grow by 15.63%. Given that Galaxy Digital has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe Galaxy Digital is more attractive than Value Line.

Value Line has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.082% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Galaxy Digital has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Value Line has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Galaxy Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Value Line pays 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Galaxy Digital pays out 15.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line quarterly revenues are $9M, which are larger than Galaxy Digital quarterly revenues of --. Value Line's net income of $5.2M is higher than Galaxy Digital's net income of --. Notably, Value Line's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.05x while Galaxy Digital's PE ratio is 46.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line is 10.26x versus 0.05x for Galaxy Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morningstar has a net margin of 57.58% compared to Value Line's net margin of 13.49%. Value Line's return on equity of 22.91% beat Morningstar's return on equity of 25.24%.

Value Line has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Morningstar has an analysts' consensus of $341.67 which suggests that it could grow by 17.92%. Given that Morningstar has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe Morningstar is more attractive than Value Line.

Value Line has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.082% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morningstar has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.312%.

Value Line has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Morningstar offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Value Line pays 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Morningstar pays out 18.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than Morningstar quarterly revenues of $581.9M. Value Line's net income of $5.2M is lower than Morningstar's net income of $78.5M. Notably, Value Line's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.05x while Morningstar's PE ratio is 32.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line is 10.26x versus 5.40x for Morningstar. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 57.58% compared to Value Line's net margin of 18.9%. Value Line's return on equity of 22.91% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 11.5%.

Value Line has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $92.28 which suggests that it could grow by 3.64%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than Value Line, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than Value Line.

Value Line has a beta of 1.061, which suggesting that the stock is 6.082% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.97700000000001%.

Value Line has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Value Line pays 55.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 48.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Value Line quarterly revenues are $9M, which are smaller than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Value Line's net income of $5.2M is lower than Nasdaq's net income of $395M. Notably, Value Line's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.05x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 40.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Value Line is 10.26x versus 6.60x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.