UPST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EZCORP has a net margin of -1.15% compared to Upstart Holdings's net margin of 8.29%. Upstart Holdings's return on equity of -10.67% beat EZCORP's return on equity of 10.97%.

Upstart Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.36, signalling downside risk potential of -12.48%. On the other hand EZCORP has an analysts' consensus of $21.00 which suggests that it could grow by 47.68%. Given that EZCORP has higher upside potential than Upstart Holdings, analysts believe EZCORP is more attractive than Upstart Holdings.

Upstart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EZCORP has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.074%.

Upstart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EZCORP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upstart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EZCORP pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upstart Holdings quarterly revenues are $213.4M, which are smaller than EZCORP quarterly revenues of $306.3M. Upstart Holdings's net income of -$2.4M is lower than EZCORP's net income of $25.4M. Notably, Upstart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EZCORP's PE ratio is 11.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upstart Holdings is 9.83x versus 0.99x for EZCORP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FirstCash Holdings has a net margin of -1.15% compared to Upstart Holdings's net margin of 9.99%. Upstart Holdings's return on equity of -10.67% beat FirstCash Holdings's return on equity of 13.86%.

Upstart Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.36, signalling downside risk potential of -12.48%. On the other hand FirstCash Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $149.25 which suggests that it could grow by 14.26%. Given that FirstCash Holdings has higher upside potential than Upstart Holdings, analysts believe FirstCash Holdings is more attractive than Upstart Holdings.

Upstart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FirstCash Holdings has a beta of 0.624, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.554%.

Upstart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FirstCash Holdings offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Upstart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings pays out 25.41% of its earnings as a dividend. FirstCash Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Upstart Holdings quarterly revenues are $213.4M, which are smaller than FirstCash Holdings quarterly revenues of $836.4M. Upstart Holdings's net income of -$2.4M is lower than FirstCash Holdings's net income of $83.6M. Notably, Upstart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FirstCash Holdings's PE ratio is 20.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upstart Holdings is 9.83x versus 1.74x for FirstCash Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Market Capital has a net margin of -1.15% compared to Upstart Holdings's net margin of -3.85%. Upstart Holdings's return on equity of -10.67% beat Old Market Capital's return on equity of -7.14%.

Upstart Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.36, signalling downside risk potential of -12.48%. On the other hand Old Market Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Upstart Holdings has higher upside potential than Old Market Capital, analysts believe Upstart Holdings is more attractive than Old Market Capital.

Upstart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Market Capital has a beta of 0.889, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.113%.

Upstart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Old Market Capital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Upstart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Old Market Capital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Upstart Holdings quarterly revenues are $213.4M, which are larger than Old Market Capital quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Upstart Holdings's net income of -$2.4M is lower than Old Market Capital's net income of -$124K. Notably, Upstart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Old Market Capital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upstart Holdings is 9.83x versus 4.12x for Old Market Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SLM has a net margin of -1.15% compared to Upstart Holdings's net margin of 52.42%. Upstart Holdings's return on equity of -10.67% beat SLM's return on equity of 28.08%.

Upstart Holdings has a consensus price target of $67.36, signalling downside risk potential of -12.48%. On the other hand SLM has an analysts' consensus of $37.73 which suggests that it could grow by 15.39%. Given that SLM has higher upside potential than Upstart Holdings, analysts believe SLM is more attractive than Upstart Holdings.

Upstart Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SLM has a beta of 1.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.466%.

Upstart Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SLM offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Upstart Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SLM pays out 19.31% of its earnings as a dividend. SLM's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Upstart Holdings quarterly revenues are $213.4M, which are smaller than SLM quarterly revenues of $581M. Upstart Holdings's net income of -$2.4M is lower than SLM's net income of $304.5M. Notably, Upstart Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SLM's PE ratio is 11.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Upstart Holdings is 9.83x versus 3.79x for SLM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.