UG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Estee Lauder Companies has a net margin of 22.61% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 4.48%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 25.15% beat The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -17.08%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Estee Lauder Companies has an analysts' consensus of $77.72 which suggests that it could fall by -10.05%. Given that The Estee Lauder Companies has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe The Estee Lauder Companies is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.914, which suggesting that the stock is 8.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.175, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.463%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.53%. The Estee Lauder Companies offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. United-Guardian pays 84.79% of its earnings as a dividend. The Estee Lauder Companies pays out 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. United-Guardian's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Estee Lauder Companies's is not.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues of $3.6B. United-Guardian's net income of $560.9K is lower than The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of $159M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.76x while The Estee Lauder Companies's PE ratio is 124.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.75x versus 2.11x for The Estee Lauder Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Edgewell Personal Care has a net margin of 22.61% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 4.99%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 25.15% beat Edgewell Personal Care's return on equity of 5.48%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Edgewell Personal Care has an analysts' consensus of $31.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.62%. Given that Edgewell Personal Care has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Edgewell Personal Care is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.914, which suggesting that the stock is 8.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Edgewell Personal Care has a beta of 0.786, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.422%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.53%. Edgewell Personal Care offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. United-Guardian pays 84.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Edgewell Personal Care pays out 31.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Edgewell Personal Care quarterly revenues of $580.7M. United-Guardian's net income of $560.9K is lower than Edgewell Personal Care's net income of $29M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.76x while Edgewell Personal Care's PE ratio is 15.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.75x versus 0.57x for Edgewell Personal Care. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interparfums has a net margin of 22.61% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 12.54%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 25.15% beat Interparfums's return on equity of 17.47%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Interparfums has an analysts' consensus of $165.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.77%. Given that Interparfums has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Interparfums is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.914, which suggesting that the stock is 8.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interparfums has a beta of 1.365, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.549%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.53%. Interparfums offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. United-Guardian pays 84.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Interparfums pays out 58.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Interparfums quarterly revenues of $338.8M. United-Guardian's net income of $560.9K is lower than Interparfums's net income of $42.5M. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.76x while Interparfums's PE ratio is 25.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.75x versus 2.92x for Interparfums. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 22.61% compared to United-Guardian's net margin of 19.06%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 25.15% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14%.

United-Guardian has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $171.79 which suggests that it could grow by 11.75%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than United-Guardian, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than United-Guardian.

United-Guardian has a beta of 0.914, which suggesting that the stock is 8.61% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.527%.

United-Guardian has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.53%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. United-Guardian pays 84.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United-Guardian quarterly revenues are $2.5M, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $19.8B. United-Guardian's net income of $560.9K is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B. Notably, United-Guardian's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.76x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 24.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United-Guardian is 3.75x versus 4.51x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.