TZUP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dolphin Entertainment has a net margin of -1414213.25% compared to Thumzup Media's net margin of -19.14%. Thumzup Media's return on equity of -328.07% beat Dolphin Entertainment's return on equity of -97.04%.

Thumzup Media has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dolphin Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 316.67%. Given that Dolphin Entertainment has higher upside potential than Thumzup Media, analysts believe Dolphin Entertainment is more attractive than Thumzup Media.

Thumzup Media has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dolphin Entertainment has a beta of 2.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.244%.

Thumzup Media has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dolphin Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thumzup Media pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dolphin Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thumzup Media quarterly revenues are $150, which are smaller than Dolphin Entertainment quarterly revenues of $12.2M. Thumzup Media's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Dolphin Entertainment's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Thumzup Media's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dolphin Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thumzup Media is 224,645.33x versus 0.27x for Dolphin Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lendway has a net margin of -1414213.25% compared to Thumzup Media's net margin of 3.61%. Thumzup Media's return on equity of -328.07% beat Lendway's return on equity of -29.67%.

Thumzup Media has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lendway has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Thumzup Media has higher upside potential than Lendway, analysts believe Thumzup Media is more attractive than Lendway.

Thumzup Media has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendway has a beta of 2.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.885%.

Thumzup Media has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendway offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thumzup Media pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lendway pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thumzup Media quarterly revenues are $150, which are smaller than Lendway quarterly revenues of $12.4M. Thumzup Media's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Lendway's net income of $449K. Notably, Thumzup Media's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lendway's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thumzup Media is 224,645.33x versus 0.21x for Lendway. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Magnite has a net margin of -1414213.25% compared to Thumzup Media's net margin of -6.19%. Thumzup Media's return on equity of -328.07% beat Magnite's return on equity of 4.24%.

Thumzup Media has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magnite has an analysts' consensus of $22.72 which suggests that it could fall by -5.53%. Given that Magnite has higher upside potential than Thumzup Media, analysts believe Magnite is more attractive than Thumzup Media.

Thumzup Media has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magnite has a beta of 2.922, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 192.224%.

Thumzup Media has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magnite offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thumzup Media pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magnite pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thumzup Media quarterly revenues are $150, which are smaller than Magnite quarterly revenues of $155.8M. Thumzup Media's net income of -$2.1M is higher than Magnite's net income of -$9.6M. Notably, Thumzup Media's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magnite's PE ratio is 120.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thumzup Media is 224,645.33x versus 5.32x for Magnite. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ziff Davis has a net margin of -1414213.25% compared to Thumzup Media's net margin of 7.38%. Thumzup Media's return on equity of -328.07% beat Ziff Davis's return on equity of 4.19%.

Thumzup Media has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ziff Davis has an analysts' consensus of $41.33 which suggests that it could grow by 33.85%. Given that Ziff Davis has higher upside potential than Thumzup Media, analysts believe Ziff Davis is more attractive than Thumzup Media.

Thumzup Media has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ziff Davis has a beta of 1.580, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.999%.

Thumzup Media has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ziff Davis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Thumzup Media pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ziff Davis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Thumzup Media quarterly revenues are $150, which are smaller than Ziff Davis quarterly revenues of $328.6M. Thumzup Media's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Ziff Davis's net income of $24.2M. Notably, Thumzup Media's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ziff Davis's PE ratio is 18.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Thumzup Media is 224,645.33x versus 0.99x for Ziff Davis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.