TRVG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Meta Platforms has a net margin of -6.28% compared to trivago NV's net margin of 39.34%. trivago NV's return on equity of -11.76% beat Meta Platforms's return on equity of 39.74%.

trivago NV has a consensus price target of $4.80, signalling upside risk potential of 30.03%. On the other hand Meta Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $741.98 which suggests that it could grow by 5.56%. Given that trivago NV has higher upside potential than Meta Platforms, analysts believe trivago NV is more attractive than Meta Platforms.

trivago NV has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.164% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.504%.

trivago NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Meta Platforms offers a yield of 0.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. trivago NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms pays out 8.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Meta Platforms's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

trivago NV quarterly revenues are $130.6M, which are smaller than Meta Platforms quarterly revenues of $42.3B. trivago NV's net income of -$8.2M is lower than Meta Platforms's net income of $16.6B. Notably, trivago NV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Meta Platforms's PE ratio is 27.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for trivago NV is 0.50x versus 10.74x for Meta Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Opera has a net margin of -6.28% compared to trivago NV's net margin of 14.56%. trivago NV's return on equity of -11.76% beat Opera's return on equity of 17.82%.

trivago NV has a consensus price target of $4.80, signalling upside risk potential of 30.03%. On the other hand Opera has an analysts' consensus of $25.93 which suggests that it could grow by 39.33%. Given that Opera has higher upside potential than trivago NV, analysts believe Opera is more attractive than trivago NV.

trivago NV has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.164% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Opera has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.218%.

trivago NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Opera offers a yield of 4.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. trivago NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Opera pays out 46.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Opera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

trivago NV quarterly revenues are $130.6M, which are larger than Opera quarterly revenues of $123.2M. trivago NV's net income of -$8.2M is lower than Opera's net income of $17.9M. Notably, trivago NV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Opera's PE ratio is 19.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for trivago NV is 0.50x versus 3.21x for Opera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

comScore has a net margin of -6.28% compared to trivago NV's net margin of -4.66%. trivago NV's return on equity of -11.76% beat comScore's return on equity of -434.38%.

trivago NV has a consensus price target of $4.80, signalling upside risk potential of 30.03%. On the other hand comScore has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 8.7%. Given that trivago NV has higher upside potential than comScore, analysts believe trivago NV is more attractive than comScore.

trivago NV has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.164% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison comScore has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.352%.

trivago NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. comScore offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. trivago NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. comScore pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

trivago NV quarterly revenues are $130.6M, which are larger than comScore quarterly revenues of $85.7M. trivago NV's net income of -$8.2M is lower than comScore's net income of -$4M. Notably, trivago NV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while comScore's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for trivago NV is 0.50x versus 0.07x for comScore. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zedge has a net margin of -6.28% compared to trivago NV's net margin of 2.39%. trivago NV's return on equity of -11.76% beat Zedge's return on equity of -6.29%.

trivago NV has a consensus price target of $4.80, signalling upside risk potential of 30.03%. On the other hand Zedge has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.94%. Given that trivago NV has higher upside potential than Zedge, analysts believe trivago NV is more attractive than Zedge.

trivago NV has a beta of 1.222, which suggesting that the stock is 22.164% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zedge has a beta of 0.997, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.337%.

trivago NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zedge offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. trivago NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zedge pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

trivago NV quarterly revenues are $130.6M, which are larger than Zedge quarterly revenues of $7.8M. trivago NV's net income of -$8.2M is lower than Zedge's net income of $185K. Notably, trivago NV's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zedge's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for trivago NV is 0.50x versus 2.07x for Zedge. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.