TIGR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dunxin Financial Holdings has a net margin of 24.81% compared to UP Fintech Holding's net margin of --. UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 13.49% beat Dunxin Financial Holdings's return on equity of --.

UP Fintech Holding has a consensus price target of $10.19, signalling upside risk potential of 3.78%. On the other hand Dunxin Financial Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UP Fintech Holding has higher upside potential than Dunxin Financial Holdings, analysts believe UP Fintech Holding is more attractive than Dunxin Financial Holdings.

UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.918% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dunxin Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

UP Fintech Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dunxin Financial Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UP Fintech Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dunxin Financial Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues are $122.6M, which are larger than Dunxin Financial Holdings quarterly revenues of --. UP Fintech Holding's net income of $30.4M is higher than Dunxin Financial Holdings's net income of --. Notably, UP Fintech Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.82x while Dunxin Financial Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UP Fintech Holding is 3.89x versus -- for Dunxin Financial Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HDFC Bank has a net margin of 24.81% compared to UP Fintech Holding's net margin of 25.7%. UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 13.49% beat HDFC Bank's return on equity of 12.02%.

UP Fintech Holding has a consensus price target of $10.19, signalling upside risk potential of 3.78%. On the other hand HDFC Bank has an analysts' consensus of $86.23 which suggests that it could grow by 13.9%. Given that HDFC Bank has higher upside potential than UP Fintech Holding, analysts believe HDFC Bank is more attractive than UP Fintech Holding.

UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.918% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HDFC Bank has a beta of 0.639, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.068%.

UP Fintech Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HDFC Bank offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. UP Fintech Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HDFC Bank pays out 23.47% of its earnings as a dividend. HDFC Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues are $122.6M, which are smaller than HDFC Bank quarterly revenues of $8.5B. UP Fintech Holding's net income of $30.4M is lower than HDFC Bank's net income of $2.2B. Notably, UP Fintech Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.82x while HDFC Bank's PE ratio is 23.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UP Fintech Holding is 3.89x versus 8.71x for HDFC Bank. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maase has a net margin of 24.81% compared to UP Fintech Holding's net margin of --. UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 13.49% beat Maase's return on equity of --.

UP Fintech Holding has a consensus price target of $10.19, signalling upside risk potential of 3.78%. On the other hand Maase has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UP Fintech Holding has higher upside potential than Maase, analysts believe UP Fintech Holding is more attractive than Maase.

UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.918% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maase has a beta of -0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.421%.

UP Fintech Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Maase offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UP Fintech Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Maase pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues are $122.6M, which are larger than Maase quarterly revenues of --. UP Fintech Holding's net income of $30.4M is higher than Maase's net income of --. Notably, UP Fintech Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.82x while Maase's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UP Fintech Holding is 3.89x versus 0.06x for Maase. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pintec Technology Holdings has a net margin of 24.81% compared to UP Fintech Holding's net margin of --. UP Fintech Holding's return on equity of 13.49% beat Pintec Technology Holdings's return on equity of --.

UP Fintech Holding has a consensus price target of $10.19, signalling upside risk potential of 3.78%. On the other hand Pintec Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UP Fintech Holding has higher upside potential than Pintec Technology Holdings, analysts believe UP Fintech Holding is more attractive than Pintec Technology Holdings.

UP Fintech Holding has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.918% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pintec Technology Holdings has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.195%.

UP Fintech Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pintec Technology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UP Fintech Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pintec Technology Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UP Fintech Holding quarterly revenues are $122.6M, which are larger than Pintec Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of --. UP Fintech Holding's net income of $30.4M is higher than Pintec Technology Holdings's net income of --. Notably, UP Fintech Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.82x while Pintec Technology Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UP Fintech Holding is 3.89x versus 3.41x for Pintec Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.