TENB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of -9.59% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of 11.45%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74% beat Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 21.23%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.30, signalling upside risk potential of 13.02%. On the other hand Palo Alto Networks has an analysts' consensus of $212.14 which suggests that it could grow by 10.15%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.798, which suggesting that the stock is 20.19% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.889%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palo Alto Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palo Alto Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.1M, which are smaller than Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M is lower than Palo Alto Networks's net income of $262.1M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palo Alto Networks's PE ratio is 110.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.27x versus 15.37x for Palo Alto Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of -9.59% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of 5.06%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.46%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.30, signalling upside risk potential of 13.02%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $92.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.72%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than Tenable Holdings, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than Tenable Holdings.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.798, which suggesting that the stock is 20.19% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.189%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.1M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $498.1M. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M is lower than ePlus's net income of $25.2M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ePlus's PE ratio is 17.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.27x versus 0.89x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of -9.59% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of 15.63%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 9.8%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.30, signalling upside risk potential of 13.02%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $52.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.2%. Given that Red Violet has higher upside potential than Tenable Holdings, analysts believe Red Violet is more attractive than Tenable Holdings.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.798, which suggesting that the stock is 20.19% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.756, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.639%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.1M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $22M. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M is lower than Red Violet's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Violet's PE ratio is 72.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.27x versus 8.04x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of -9.59% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of -40.61%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -11.74% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -36.56%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $37.30, signalling upside risk potential of 13.02%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 114.65%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than Tenable Holdings, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than Tenable Holdings.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.798, which suggesting that the stock is 20.19% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.162, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.152%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $239.1M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $63.7M. Tenable Holdings's net income of -$22.9M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$25.8M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.27x versus 0.20x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.