SPWH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Big 5 Sporting Goods has a net margin of -8.53% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of -9.82%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -15.3% beat Big 5 Sporting Goods's return on equity of -39.38%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.45, signalling downside risk potential of -0.29%. On the other hand Big 5 Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 216.9%. Given that Big 5 Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, analysts believe Big 5 Sporting Goods is more attractive than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Big 5 Sporting Goods has a beta of 2.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.727%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Big 5 Sporting Goods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Big 5 Sporting Goods pays out -4.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $249.1M, which are larger than Big 5 Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $175.6M. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$21.3M is lower than Big 5 Sporting Goods's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Big 5 Sporting Goods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.11x versus 0.04x for Big 5 Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of -8.53% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of 8.33%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -15.3% beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 38.67%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.45, signalling downside risk potential of -0.29%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $204.70 which suggests that it could grow by 2.47%. Given that Dick's Sporting Goods has higher upside potential than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.617%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $249.1M, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$21.3M is lower than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $264.3M. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 14.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.11x versus 1.22x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

1-800-Flowers.com has a net margin of -8.53% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of -53.78%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -15.3% beat 1-800-Flowers.com's return on equity of -38.44%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.45, signalling downside risk potential of -0.29%. On the other hand 1-800-Flowers.com has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 66.67%. Given that 1-800-Flowers.com has higher upside potential than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, analysts believe 1-800-Flowers.com is more attractive than Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 1-800-Flowers.com has a beta of 1.479, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.898%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 1-800-Flowers.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 1-800-Flowers.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $249.1M, which are smaller than 1-800-Flowers.com quarterly revenues of $331.5M. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$21.3M is higher than 1-800-Flowers.com's net income of -$178.2M. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 1-800-Flowers.com's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.11x versus 0.20x for 1-800-Flowers.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GHST World has a net margin of -8.53% compared to Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net margin of -663.13%. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's return on equity of -15.3% beat GHST World's return on equity of --.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a consensus price target of $3.45, signalling downside risk potential of -0.29%. On the other hand GHST World has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has higher upside potential than GHST World, analysts believe Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is more attractive than GHST World.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a beta of 0.671, which suggesting that the stock is 32.894% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GHST World has a beta of 0.003, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.686%.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GHST World offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GHST World pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings quarterly revenues are $249.1M, which are larger than GHST World quarterly revenues of $4.8K. Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's net income of -$21.3M is lower than GHST World's net income of -$31.5K. Notably, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GHST World's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings is 0.11x versus 113.60x for GHST World. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.