PUBM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cognizant Technology Solutions has a net margin of -14.86% compared to PubMatic's net margin of 12.96%. PubMatic's return on equity of 1.97% beat Cognizant Technology Solutions's return on equity of 16.56%.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 26.74%. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $87.65 which suggests that it could grow by 17.13%. Given that PubMatic has higher upside potential than Cognizant Technology Solutions, analysts believe PubMatic is more attractive than Cognizant Technology Solutions.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions has a beta of 0.957, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.288%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions pays out 26.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $63.8M, which are smaller than Cognizant Technology Solutions quarterly revenues of $5.1B. PubMatic's net income of -$9.5M is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions's net income of $663M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 152.88x while Cognizant Technology Solutions's PE ratio is 15.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 2.35x versus 1.85x for Cognizant Technology Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of -14.86% compared to PubMatic's net margin of -35.76%. PubMatic's return on equity of 1.97% beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 20.97%.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 26.74%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of $60.60 which suggests that it could grow by 58.72%. Given that Exodus Movement has higher upside potential than PubMatic, analysts believe Exodus Movement is more attractive than PubMatic.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $63.8M, which are larger than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $36M. PubMatic's net income of -$9.5M is higher than Exodus Movement's net income of -$12.9M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 152.88x while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 29.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 2.35x versus 9.12x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Freshworks has a net margin of -14.86% compared to PubMatic's net margin of -0.66%. PubMatic's return on equity of 1.97% beat Freshworks's return on equity of -6.63%.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 26.74%. On the other hand Freshworks has an analysts' consensus of $19.86 which suggests that it could grow by 42.65%. Given that Freshworks has higher upside potential than PubMatic, analysts believe Freshworks is more attractive than PubMatic.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freshworks has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freshworks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freshworks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $63.8M, which are smaller than Freshworks quarterly revenues of $196.3M. PubMatic's net income of -$9.5M is lower than Freshworks's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 152.88x while Freshworks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 2.35x versus 5.59x for Freshworks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of -14.86% compared to PubMatic's net margin of -8.17%. PubMatic's return on equity of 1.97% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -11.58%.

PubMatic has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 26.74%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $25.33 which suggests that it could grow by 69.23%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than PubMatic, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than PubMatic.

PubMatic has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PubMatic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PubMatic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PubMatic quarterly revenues are $63.8M, which are smaller than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $264.4M. PubMatic's net income of -$9.5M is higher than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of -$21.6M. Notably, PubMatic's price-to-earnings ratio is 152.88x while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PubMatic is 2.35x versus 2.73x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.