PRDO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Adtalem Global Education has a net margin of 20.51% compared to Perdoceo Education's net margin of 13.05%. Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39% beat Adtalem Global Education's return on equity of 16.71%.

Perdoceo Education has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.64%. On the other hand Adtalem Global Education has an analysts' consensus of $143.25 which suggests that it could grow by 22.88%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Adtalem Global Education, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Adtalem Global Education.

Perdoceo Education has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.343% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adtalem Global Education has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.008%.

Perdoceo Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Adtalem Global Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perdoceo Education pays 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Adtalem Global Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues are $213M, which are smaller than Adtalem Global Education quarterly revenues of $466.1M. Perdoceo Education's net income of $43.7M is lower than Adtalem Global Education's net income of $60.8M. Notably, Perdoceo Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.15x while Adtalem Global Education's PE ratio is 19.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perdoceo Education is 2.75x versus 2.58x for Adtalem Global Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Educational Services has a net margin of 20.51% compared to Perdoceo Education's net margin of 1.65%. Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39% beat Lincoln Educational Services's return on equity of 7.04%.

Perdoceo Education has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.64%. On the other hand Lincoln Educational Services has an analysts' consensus of $25.80 which suggests that it could grow by 12.27%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Lincoln Educational Services, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Lincoln Educational Services.

Perdoceo Education has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.343% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Educational Services has a beta of 1.584, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.42%.

Perdoceo Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Lincoln Educational Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perdoceo Education pays 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Educational Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues are $213M, which are larger than Lincoln Educational Services quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Perdoceo Education's net income of $43.7M is higher than Lincoln Educational Services's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Perdoceo Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.15x while Lincoln Educational Services's PE ratio is 58.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perdoceo Education is 2.75x versus 1.57x for Lincoln Educational Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Grand Canyon Education has a net margin of 20.51% compared to Perdoceo Education's net margin of 24.76%. Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39% beat Grand Canyon Education's return on equity of 29.87%.

Perdoceo Education has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.64%. On the other hand Grand Canyon Education has an analysts' consensus of $213.33 which suggests that it could grow by 25.18%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Grand Canyon Education, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Grand Canyon Education.

Perdoceo Education has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.343% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.774, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.608%.

Perdoceo Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Grand Canyon Education offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Perdoceo Education pays 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Grand Canyon Education pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perdoceo Education's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues are $213M, which are smaller than Grand Canyon Education quarterly revenues of $289.3M. Perdoceo Education's net income of $43.7M is lower than Grand Canyon Education's net income of $71.6M. Notably, Perdoceo Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.15x while Grand Canyon Education's PE ratio is 21.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perdoceo Education is 2.75x versus 4.71x for Grand Canyon Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Education has a net margin of 20.51% compared to Perdoceo Education's net margin of 9.8%. Perdoceo Education's return on equity of 16.39% beat Strategic Education's return on equity of 6.76%.

Perdoceo Education has a consensus price target of $40.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.64%. On the other hand Strategic Education has an analysts' consensus of $102.67 which suggests that it could grow by 28.3%. Given that Perdoceo Education has higher upside potential than Strategic Education, analysts believe Perdoceo Education is more attractive than Strategic Education.

Perdoceo Education has a beta of 0.827, which suggesting that the stock is 17.343% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Education has a beta of 0.524, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.624%.

Perdoceo Education has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Strategic Education offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Perdoceo Education pays 21.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Education pays out 52.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Perdoceo Education quarterly revenues are $213M, which are smaller than Strategic Education quarterly revenues of $303.6M. Perdoceo Education's net income of $43.7M is higher than Strategic Education's net income of $29.7M. Notably, Perdoceo Education's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.15x while Strategic Education's PE ratio is 17.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Perdoceo Education is 2.75x versus 1.57x for Strategic Education. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.