PNFP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Bancorp has a net margin of 34.46% compared to Pinnacle Financial Partners's net margin of 34.8%. Pinnacle Financial Partners's return on equity of 7.78% beat First Bancorp's return on equity of 6.06%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a consensus price target of $126.79, signalling upside risk potential of 8.83%. On the other hand First Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $48.44 which suggests that it could grow by 3.61%. Given that Pinnacle Financial Partners has higher upside potential than First Bancorp, analysts believe Pinnacle Financial Partners is more attractive than First Bancorp.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Bancorp has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.742%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. First Bancorp offers a yield of 1.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Pinnacle Financial Partners pays 17.73% of its earnings as a dividend. First Bancorp pays out 47.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pinnacle Financial Partners quarterly revenues are $407.4M, which are larger than First Bancorp quarterly revenues of $104.6M. Pinnacle Financial Partners's net income of $140.4M is higher than First Bancorp's net income of $36.4M. Notably, Pinnacle Financial Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.85x while First Bancorp's PE ratio is 22.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pinnacle Financial Partners is 5.78x versus 5.39x for First Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 34.46% compared to Pinnacle Financial Partners's net margin of 32.4%. Pinnacle Financial Partners's return on equity of 7.78% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a consensus price target of $126.79, signalling upside risk potential of 8.83%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.08%. Given that Pinnacle Financial Partners has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Pinnacle Financial Partners is more attractive than Park National.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.866%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Park National offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Pinnacle Financial Partners pays 17.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pinnacle Financial Partners quarterly revenues are $407.4M, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. Pinnacle Financial Partners's net income of $140.4M is higher than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, Pinnacle Financial Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.85x while Park National's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pinnacle Financial Partners is 5.78x versus 5.25x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triumph Financial has a net margin of 34.46% compared to Pinnacle Financial Partners's net margin of 0.02%. Pinnacle Financial Partners's return on equity of 7.78% beat Triumph Financial's return on equity of 1.35%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a consensus price target of $126.79, signalling upside risk potential of 8.83%. On the other hand Triumph Financial has an analysts' consensus of $60.50 which suggests that it could fall by -4.84%. Given that Pinnacle Financial Partners has higher upside potential than Triumph Financial, analysts believe Pinnacle Financial Partners is more attractive than Triumph Financial.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triumph Financial has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.923%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Triumph Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pinnacle Financial Partners pays 17.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Financial pays out 19.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pinnacle Financial Partners quarterly revenues are $407.4M, which are larger than Triumph Financial quarterly revenues of $101.4M. Pinnacle Financial Partners's net income of $140.4M is higher than Triumph Financial's net income of $17K. Notably, Pinnacle Financial Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.85x while Triumph Financial's PE ratio is 171.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pinnacle Financial Partners is 5.78x versus 3.62x for Triumph Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 34.46% compared to Pinnacle Financial Partners's net margin of 24.09%. Pinnacle Financial Partners's return on equity of 7.78% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a consensus price target of $126.79, signalling upside risk potential of 8.83%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.5%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Pinnacle Financial Partners, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Pinnacle Financial Partners.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a beta of 1.011, which suggesting that the stock is 1.065% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.793%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Pinnacle Financial Partners pays 17.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pinnacle Financial Partners quarterly revenues are $407.4M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Pinnacle Financial Partners's net income of $140.4M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Pinnacle Financial Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.85x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pinnacle Financial Partners is 5.78x versus 3.04x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.