PLMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Conifer Holdings has a net margin of 24.58% compared to Palomar Holdings's net margin of 4.55%. Palomar Holdings's return on equity of 20.59% beat Conifer Holdings's return on equity of 126.28%.

Palomar Holdings has a consensus price target of $182.83, signalling upside risk potential of 28.87%. On the other hand Conifer Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -29.07%. Given that Palomar Holdings has higher upside potential than Conifer Holdings, analysts believe Palomar Holdings is more attractive than Conifer Holdings.

Palomar Holdings has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.41% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conifer Holdings has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.691%.

Palomar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Conifer Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palomar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conifer Holdings pays out 1.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Conifer Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Palomar Holdings quarterly revenues are $174.6M, which are larger than Conifer Holdings quarterly revenues of $11.5M. Palomar Holdings's net income of $42.9M is higher than Conifer Holdings's net income of $522K. Notably, Palomar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.32x while Conifer Holdings's PE ratio is 0.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palomar Holdings is 6.21x versus 0.15x for Conifer Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Indemnity Group LLC has a net margin of 24.58% compared to Palomar Holdings's net margin of -3.67%. Palomar Holdings's return on equity of 20.59% beat Global Indemnity Group LLC's return on equity of 4.11%.

Palomar Holdings has a consensus price target of $182.83, signalling upside risk potential of 28.87%. On the other hand Global Indemnity Group LLC has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 80.98%. Given that Global Indemnity Group LLC has higher upside potential than Palomar Holdings, analysts believe Global Indemnity Group LLC is more attractive than Palomar Holdings.

Palomar Holdings has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.41% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Indemnity Group LLC has a beta of 0.415, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.48%.

Palomar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Indemnity Group LLC offers a yield of 4.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Palomar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Indemnity Group LLC pays out 45.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Indemnity Group LLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Palomar Holdings quarterly revenues are $174.6M, which are larger than Global Indemnity Group LLC quarterly revenues of $108.7M. Palomar Holdings's net income of $42.9M is higher than Global Indemnity Group LLC's net income of -$4M. Notably, Palomar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.32x while Global Indemnity Group LLC's PE ratio is 15.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palomar Holdings is 6.21x versus 0.96x for Global Indemnity Group LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NMI Holdings has a net margin of 24.58% compared to Palomar Holdings's net margin of 59.2%. Palomar Holdings's return on equity of 20.59% beat NMI Holdings's return on equity of 17.36%.

Palomar Holdings has a consensus price target of $182.83, signalling upside risk potential of 28.87%. On the other hand NMI Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $44.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.99%. Given that Palomar Holdings has higher upside potential than NMI Holdings, analysts believe Palomar Holdings is more attractive than NMI Holdings.

Palomar Holdings has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.41% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NMI Holdings has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.496%.

Palomar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NMI Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palomar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NMI Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palomar Holdings quarterly revenues are $174.6M, which are larger than NMI Holdings quarterly revenues of $173.2M. Palomar Holdings's net income of $42.9M is lower than NMI Holdings's net income of $102.6M. Notably, Palomar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.32x while NMI Holdings's PE ratio is 8.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palomar Holdings is 6.21x versus 4.51x for NMI Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tiptree has a net margin of 24.58% compared to Palomar Holdings's net margin of 1.14%. Palomar Holdings's return on equity of 20.59% beat Tiptree's return on equity of 7.77%.

Palomar Holdings has a consensus price target of $182.83, signalling upside risk potential of 28.87%. On the other hand Tiptree has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -77.4%. Given that Palomar Holdings has higher upside potential than Tiptree, analysts believe Palomar Holdings is more attractive than Tiptree.

Palomar Holdings has a beta of 0.456, which suggesting that the stock is 54.41% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tiptree has a beta of 1.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.53%.

Palomar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tiptree offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Palomar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tiptree pays out 46.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tiptree's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Palomar Holdings quarterly revenues are $174.6M, which are smaller than Tiptree quarterly revenues of $496.7M. Palomar Holdings's net income of $42.9M is higher than Tiptree's net income of $5.6M. Notably, Palomar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.32x while Tiptree's PE ratio is 17.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palomar Holdings is 6.21x versus 0.39x for Tiptree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.